Re: [Emu] EAP-TLS 1.3 - Session-Id and extended EAP types

On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:59 AM, John Mattsson wrote: > > Noticed the following: > > draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-04 defines the key hierarchy as > > Type-Code= 0x0D > Key_Material = TLS-Exporter("EXPORTER_EAP_TLS_Key_Material", > Type-Code, 128) > IV

[Emu] TLS Resumption across Server Name Indications for TLS 1.3

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sy-tls-resumption-group This document will be discussed today in the TLS WG 11.20 - 12.20. Might be interesting for the discussion on cross method resumption for TLS-based EAP methods. Cheers, John ___ Emu mailing

Re: [Emu] TLS Resumption across Server Name Indications for TLS 1.3

On Mar 25, 2019, at 5:36 AM, John Mattsson wrote: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sy-tls-resumption-group > > This document will be discussed today in the TLS WG 11.20 - 12.20. Might be > interesting for the discussion on cross method resumption for TLS-based EAP > methods. I took a q

[Emu] Another side meeting on IOT onboarding

For those who are interested, we will be continuing our IoT Onboarding discussion Wednesday @ 2:00pm in Karlin 3. Topics will include review of the various onboarding mechanisms that we listed on Github, review of the questions we were asking, some live editing of THAT, and some mapping of all

[Emu] Query about two types of TEAP TLS session resume

Hi, I have several questions about TEAP TLS session resume since I am not sure I succeeded to interpret the relevant sections of RFC 7170 and RFC 5077 correctly. 1) Does it make sense for TEAP server to support both TLS session resume using server state and TLS session resume using PAC? Should t