Re: [Emu] Last call comments on emu-eap-tunnel-method-05

2013-03-05 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > I have no comments that I would consider to be blocking. There are couple > of issues that should be considered to be dealt with in the last call. > > Jim > > > > 1. Lower case must/may in the document. There are disputes about the role > o

Re: [Emu] Comments on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method

2013-03-05 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > First, the document has been improved a lot in its clarity since the > last time I read it. I'd really like to thank the editors, Jim and > everyone else who gave comments for some excellent work. > > > TEAP is by far the best EAP method

Re: [Emu] Comments on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method

2013-03-05 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > Sam, > > My responses are inline. May not agree with the authors however. > > Jim > > >> -Original Message- >> From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Sam Hartman >> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 5

Re: [Emu] Comments on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method

2013-03-05 Thread Sam Hartman
OK. Based on your description of how peer and server ID are used, I have no concerns about 3.4. ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu