Re: [Emu] Comments on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method

2013-03-01 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Jim" == Jim Schaad writes: >> There doesn't seem to be a way for a server to request channel >> binding. If that's true we should probably add the following: >> Since a server cannot indicate a desire for channel binding, >> clients that Jim> have >> channel binding

Re: [Emu] Last call on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method

2013-03-01 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Alan" == Alan DeKok writes: Alan> Alan DeKok wrote: >> This is a WG last call on the draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method >> document. Please post reviews, comments, feedback, etc. to this >> list. >> >> The WG last call will last two weeks, until February 26. >>

Re: [Emu] Last call on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method

2013-03-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Sam Hartman wrote: > Uh, hello? I raised some comments in a message dated Feburary 23 with > subject "Comments on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method," , a few of which > I consider substantive and would appreciate a response to those > comments. OK. I seem to have missed that, and a post from