Dan Harkins wrote:
> Yes, I can propose a specific modification. In fact, I did already.
It wasn't clear that the text was the suggested replacement.
> It just got truncated from the thread. What I suggest is that in
> section 3.1, in the middle of the first paragraph (the text that Joe
> was
Hi Alan,
My heartburn over the "MUST tranport the username and password" text
is that it seems to be mandating some particular deployment and not
mandating functionality. The introductory text talks about cases where
the authentication server does not have cleartext access to, or a
consistent
Dan Harkins wrote:
> My heartburn over the "MUST tranport the username and password" text
> is that it seems to be mandating some particular deployment and not
> mandating functionality.
Any authentication system that stores passwords has a limited set of
choices. They can store clear-text, o
Alan,
Slicing up my posts and building up a straw man army is very
distracting. You attempted to help by adding my comment to the
problematic text. That didn't help, thanks for the effort though.
Joe, Katrin, Steve, my comment remains. There is a property we need
in the tunnel method and t
Dan Harkins wrote:
> Slicing up my posts and building up a straw man army is very
> distracting. You attempted to help by adding my comment to the
> problematic text. That didn't help, thanks for the effort though.
You brought up specific concerns, and I pointed out that the document
already a
