[Emu] Draft agenda for IETF 74

2009-03-01 Thread Alan DeKok
The following is the draft agenda for IETF 74. Please email the chairs for any concerns or updates. Blue sheets and Agenda updates 5 minutes draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-02.txt 60 minutes draft-clancy-emu-chbind-04.txt 25 minutes draft-clancy-emu-aaapay-01.txt 10 minutes draft-sheffer-em

Re: [Emu] Draft agenda for IETF 74

2009-03-01 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Alan, a few questions inline. What is more important for me is what we could at best accomplish during the meeting. > The following is the draft agenda for IETF 74. Please email >the chairs for any concerns or updates. > > > >Blue sheets and Agenda updates >5 minutes > >draft-ietf-emu-eap

[Emu] FW: I-D Action:draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-02.txt

2009-03-01 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
I believe the document contains all the changes discussed in the meeting and on the list. The document should be ready for working group last call. It would help if a few people could review it to make sure it is complete. The following link provides to access to diffs and previous versions: ht

Re: [Emu] Draft agenda for IETF 74

2009-03-01 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
> -Original Message- > From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 10:46 AM > To: 'Alan DeKok'; emu@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] Draft agenda for IETF 74 > > Hi Alan, > > a few questions inline. What is mor

[Emu] Comments from Hannes on draft-clancy-emu-aaapay-01.txt

2009-03-01 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
Hannes said: > > I understand the issue of defining channel bindings. > draft-ietf-emu-chbind-00 does this but it does not define payloads. > Do we really need to split this aspect into separate drafts? > [Joe] Not necessarily. > The aspect of having the possibility to carry an opaque blob >