Re: [Emu] Review of Requirements for a Tunnel Based EAP Method

2008-11-03 Thread Katrin Höper
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Katrin Höper > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 8:22 AM > > To: emu@ietf.org > > Subject: [Emu] Review of R

Re: [Emu] Review of Requirements for a Tunnel Based EAP Method

2008-11-03 Thread Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
> -Original Message- > From: Katrin Höper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 8:05 AM > To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) > Cc: emu@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] Review of Requirements for a Tunnel Based > EAP Method > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Joseph Salo

Re: [Emu] Review of draft-clancy-emu-chbind-03

2008-11-03 Thread Charles Clancy
Bernard, Version v04 was just submitted and should address most of your comments. We added some clarifications to discuss the "lying NAS" vs "lying provider" problems. Really all we can reasonably validate is the last hop in a AAA proxy chain. In an enterprise network, that's the NAS. In a