I am cross-posting this message to WG's that may be affected by recent
discussions surrounding i18n issues with RFC 4282. I am requesting a
few minutes on the agenda of each WG at the next meeting to discuss
these issues in more detail.
In summary: RFC 4282 has some problematic text surroundi
This is a WG call for agenda items for IETF 73. Please email the
chairs with a pointer to a draft, and a request for a specific length of
time.
Alan DeKok.
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Hi,
I have problems with some of the cryptographic binding claims in the
curent document (draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-00.txt) and would like
to discuss them on the list.
Basically it is about claiming cryptographic bindings for MitM
protection even if the inner method(s) does not derive keys.
S
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the EAP Method Update Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Requirements for an Tunnel Based EAP Method
Author(s) : K. Hoeper, et al.
Filename: