Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] RFC 4282 actually proposes that the realm portion of the NAI be
> encoded in punycode, not UTF-8.
That's just wrong. No AAA client or server does that.
At the last IETF, I had proposed in a hallway conversation, to update
portions RFC 4282 to describe what impleme
Alan DeKok said:
"> [BA] RFC 4282 actually proposes that the realm portion of the NAI be
> encoded in punycode, not UTF-8.
That's just wrong.
[BA] I agree. I don't know of any EAP peers that encode the NAI this way
(although, based on Stefan's tests, they may not use UTF-8 either).
> ...it
Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] I agree. I don't know of any EAP peers that encode the NAI this way
> (although, based on Stefan's tests, they may not use UTF-8 either).
I think the correct term is "memcpy".
> [BA] Interesting. NAIs and e-mail addresses are similar; ...
Often the same. Lever
