Dan wrote:
> The real thing holding up adoption of EAP-pwd as a work
> item is finishing work on the tunneled method. Which wouldn't
> be such a bad thing if we were further along towards that
> goal after Philly than we were after Vancouver and from the
> looks of it we won't be any further
Hi Hao,
On Wed, April 30, 2008 9:34 am, Hao Zhou (hzhou) wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
>> The real thing holding up adoption of EAP-pwd as a work
>> item is finishing work on the tunneled method. Which wouldn't
>> be such a bad thing if we were further along towards that
>> goal after Philly than we
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:50 PM
> To: emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] EMU charter revision,
>
> In re-reading this charter, I still don't think we're quite there:
>
> a.
[Joe] Jari had asked to keep this open to TLS. I think he was
suggesting it could be done as a TLS extension and would not require
tunneling. I agree that we do not want to extend EAP-TLS to do
tunneling.
How about:
"- Enable a TLS-based EAP method to support channel bindings. This item
will n
In order to get things moving we will send the following charter update
to Pasi tomorrow. I will also let Pasi and Tim know there is interest
in secure password methods and they should consider it as a topic for
SAAG.
Description of Working Group:
The Extensible Authent
I was offline when I sent the charter update. I'm not sure there has to
be only one mechanism, but I think it would be a desirable outcome. I
like your text and will include it.
Thanks,
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April
I like Bernard's text better.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:54 PM
> To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey); emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] EMU charter revision,
>
> [Joe] Jari had asked
