The response to the charter revision has been underwhelming. I am a bit
concerned that we do not have enough participation to complete the
tunnel method work (most of the recent discussion has been about other
methods).
I would like to get an idea of the number working group members that
approv
Joe:
I approve the current charter revision and am willing to contribute to
the tunnel method.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey); em
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
> Please respond to this message and state whether you approve of the
> current charter revision and what capacity you would be willing to
> contribute towards tunneled method development: contributor, reviewer or
> not able to contribute.
I approve of the char
I approve of the current charter revision and would be willing to
contribute towards tunneled method development as a contributor.
Thanks,
Steve Hanna
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2
Hi Joe,
I do NOT approve of the current charter revision, specifically the
change that says the password-based method can only be via the
tunneled method. I do approve of the inclusion of tunneled methods
in the charter though and would be willing to contribute as a
reviewer.
regards,
D
