Hao Zhou (hzhou) wrote:
> I think publishing a "widely" deployed EAP method is orthogonal to
> publishing a new method meeting EMU charter. I agree publishing the
> existing method as deployed is something needs to be done quickly. I am
> still doubtful that adding the extra stuff required to meet
> "Alan" == Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> Hao Zhou (hzhou) wrote:
>> I think publishing a "widely" deployed EAP method is orthogonal
>> to publishing a new method meeting EMU charter. I agree
>> publishing the existing method as deployed is something needs
>>
> "Lakshminath" == Lakshminath Dondeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lakshminath> I would like to see the crypto-binding stuff (not
Lakshminath> compound binding -- as others have noted, we don't
Lakshminath> have consensus on that topic) and extensibility (how
Lakshminath> to ad
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan DeKok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 5:56 AM
> To: Hao Zhou (hzhou)
> Cc: Sam Hartman; emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] Crypto-binding in TTLS-v0
>
> Hao Zhou (hzhou) wrote:
> > I think publishing a "widely" deployed EAP me
Sam,
We discussed channel binding before the publication of 4962 (I was
reminded recently that draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt is now a published
document :) ) and concluded (I think) that the language in 4962 should
just mirror the language of 3748. I think that is what 4962 in fact does:
"As d
