Doesn't RFC 4962 mandate that channel binding has to be provided by an EAP
method. At least it gets mentioned every time in discussions about new EAP
methods.
As far as I can tell, there is no channel binding requirement in RFC 4962.
RFC 4017 lists Channel Binding as optional. During EAP WG
Hi Bernard,
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Sam also suggested to add channel bindings and to address
internalization support in a proper way.
Do you mean internationalization?
Typo.
Yes. That's what I meant.
If so, I'm not quite sure what this means. RFC 4282 supports
internationalization of the
Sam also suggested to add channel bindings and to address internalization
support in a proper way.
Do you mean internationalization?
If so, I'm not quite sure what this means. RFC 4282 supports
internationalization of the NAI. Are we talking about internationalization
of error messages? Fo
