Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2018-03-05 Thread John Mattsson
Hi Joe, I’d like us to discuss the use of EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 as well as strategies on how to avoid fragmentation due to large certificates and certificate chains in all versions of EAP-TLS. I plan to submit a new version of draft-mattsson-eap-tls13. Cheers, John

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2018-03-04 Thread Jari Arkko
Hi Joe, I’d like us to talk about both RFC 5448bis and, separately the work on adding PFS to EAP-AKA’. I plan to submit new version of drafts on both topics. Jari ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-16 Thread Pascal Urien
Hi Sam, Thank you for this support. I am going to publish this draft as informational document I will attend to this next EMU WG meeting in Paris Regards Pascal 2012/3/15 Sam Hartman > > "Pascal" == Pascal Urien writes: > > Pascal> Hi Sam EMU meansEAP Method Update. > > Hi. T

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-14 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Pascal" == Pascal Urien writes: Pascal> Hi Sam EMU meansEAP Method Update. Hi. Thanks for the clarification. It turns out I'm reasonably familiar with the history of the EMU and EAP working groups. I remain confused. If you are ready to publish your draft, why do you need to present

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-14 Thread Pascal Urien
Hi Sam EMU meansEAP Method Update. The EMU WG is the child of the EAP WG The eap smartcard draft was presented several times to the EAP WG. But the support of efficient implementation and its compatibility with smartphone OS, required more time than the EAP WG lifetime Regards Pascal

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-14 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Pascal" == Pascal Urien writes: Pascal> The goal of the presentation at the IETF 83 in Paris is to Pascal> push this draft as an Informational RFC. Hi. I'm glad you want to publish this work as an RFC because I believe it's valuable and I'd like to see it an archival form. I'm su

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-13 Thread Pascal Urien
Hi Sam "EAP Support in Smartcard" targets an Informational RFC. The first version was released in 2002 and presented at the IETF 55th in Atlanta., last version (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-urien-eap-smartcard-22) was issued in January 2012. Today many implementations (EAP-SIM, EAP-AKA , EAP

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-13 Thread Sam Hartman
Hi. I'm confused. I'd like to understand why you'd like to present this draft? What response are you hoping for from the EMU working group? ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-11 Thread Hao Zhou
> I would like 30 mins of discussion on TEAP, > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-02.txt > > > 2012/3/6 Alan DeKok >>  Please submit requests for agenda items to the EMU chairs. >> >>  Alan DeKok. >> ___ >> Emu mailing list >>

Re: [Emu] Call for Agenda items

2012-03-11 Thread Pascal Urien
Hi All I would like present the draft-urien-eap-smartcard-22.txt ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-urien-eap-smartcard-22 ) at the next EMU IETF meeting in Paris. This draft, whose first version was issued in 2002, is an ISO7816 interface for EAP methods such as EAP-SIM, EAP-AKA and EAP-TLS. It

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items for IETF

2011-02-28 Thread Sam Hartman
I'd very much like to discuss the changes to the channel binding draft. The highest level item is whether we're going in the right direction. I'd also like to come to closure on Alan's comment about whether we want each AVP split out or whether we want to reuse more of the RADIUS/whatever encoding

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-10 Thread SeongHan Shin
ch 11, 2010 10:33 AM > To: 'Alan DeKok' > Cc: emu@ietf.org; 'Kazukuni Kobara'; 'SeongHan Shin' > Subject: RE: [Emu] Call for agenda items > > Dear Alan DeKok, > > We are negotiating with our IP (Intellectual Property) department > for th

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-10 Thread SeongHan Shin
Kazukuni Kobara > Subject: Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items > > SeongHan Shin wrote: > > Could you please let me know when the deadline of IPR disclosure is? > > Before the meeting. > > Alan DeKok. ___ Emu mailing list

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-09 Thread ncamwing
Hi Alan, I would like get a slot to discuss a submitted draft: Filename: draft-cam-winget-eap-tlv Revision: 00 Title: EAP Type-Length-Value Container Creation_date: 2010-01-05 Thanks, Nancy On 2/24/10 1:30 AM, "Alan DeKok" wrote: > > We have a 1 hour slot on Wednesd

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-07 Thread Alan DeKok
Glen Zorn wrote: >> SeongHan Shin wrote: >>> Could you please let me know when the deadline of IPR disclosure is? >> Before the meeting. > > A little justification, please. See RFC 3979 (among others). Disclosure is required for participation in the IETF. The document in question states t

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-07 Thread Glen Zorn
> SeongHan Shin wrote: > > Could you please let me know when the deadline of IPR disclosure is? > > Before the meeting. A little justification, please. > > Alan DeKok. > ___ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-07 Thread Alan DeKok
SeongHan Shin wrote: > Could you please let me know when the deadline of IPR disclosure is? Before the meeting. Alan DeKok. ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-07 Thread SeongHan Shin
Dear Alan DeKok, Could you please let me know when the deadline of IPR disclosure is? Best regards, Shin On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:14 AM, SeongHan Shin wrote: > Dear Alan DeKok, > Currently, we are contacting with our IP (Intellectual Property) department > about the licensing information. > >

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-06 Thread SeongHan Shin
Dear Alan DeKok, Currently, we are contacting with our IP (Intellectual Property) department about the licensing information. We hope to file the IPR disclosure soon. Best regards, Shin On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > (sorry, hit too soon) > > SeongHan Shin wrote: > > De

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-06 Thread Alan DeKok
(sorry, hit too soon) SeongHan Shin wrote: > Dear Alan DeKok, > > I'm Shin. > > I submitted the below I-D (00) and want to introduce our work. > Could you please let me know if it is possible for me to present > our work in emu WG? Section 6 of the document says that a patent has been file

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-06 Thread Alan DeKok
SeongHan Shin wrote: > Dear Alan DeKok, > > I'm Shin. > > I submitted the below I-D (00) and want to introduce our work. > Could you please let me know if it is possible for me to present > our work in emu WG? Section 6 of the document says that a patent has been filed. However, there is no I

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items

2010-03-04 Thread SeongHan Shin
Dear Alan DeKok, I'm Shin. I submitted the below I-D (00) and want to introduce our work. Could you please let me know if it is possible for me to present our work in emu WG? Filename:draft-shin-augmented-pake Revision:00 Title: Most Efficient Augmented Password-Only A

Re: [Emu] Call for agenda items for IETF 75

2009-07-09 Thread Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37
Hi, I would like to request a 20 min slot to discuss the current status of the channel binding draft (draft-clancy-emu-chbind-04). Thanks, Katrin > -Original Message- > From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alan > DeKok > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:52