Alan DeKok wrote:
>> I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that
>> it's deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did
>> exist and it would also keep the section numbering unchanged making it
>> easier to compare RFC 7170 and its update
On Aug 21, 2023, at 11:05 AM, Heikki Vatiainen
wrote:
>
> The list in section 4.2.1 "General TLV Format" includes:
>11 PAC TLV (DEPRECATED)
>
> I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that it's
> deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did exist
The list in section 4.2.1 "General TLV Format" includes:
11 PAC TLV (DEPRECATED)
I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that it's
deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did exist and
it would also keep the section numbering unchanged making it easi
