;mailto:emu@ietf.org>" mailto:emu@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [Emu] Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00
From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:39 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: emu@ietf.org<mailto:emu@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Revie
From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:39 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00
Jim:
Thanks very much for your detailed review. Please see the comments below. We
will respond
I think that picks up all of my current comments. Looking forward to seeing
the draft update.
Jim
From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00
Jim:
Thanks very much for your detailed review. Please see the comments below. We
will respond to your other emails shortly.
On 9/28/12 9:18 PM, "Jim Schaad"
mailto:i...@augustcellars.com>> wrote:
1. In section 3.2.3, it says that a new PAC can be requested after a full
TLS handshake. Can on
1. In section 3.2.3, it says that a new PAC can be requested after a full
TLS handshake. Can one be requested following an abbreviated handshake? Or
do you just re-use the existing PAC?
2. Section 3.3 s/descried/described/
3. Section 3.4 - Is it possible to have multiple server ids after the
