I think this document can advance.
It did raise some questions, mainly about how this document
and draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa work together, but I'll get back to that
separately.
Heikki
On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 22:02, Peter Yee wrote:
> Draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls has two days left on its WGLC
+1
> On Sep 24, 2024, at 5:39 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> I think this draft ready to go as well. I know that Owen has prototyped it,
> and I'd like to see it advance.
>
> Eliot
>
> On 23.09.2024 21:01, Peter Yee wrote:
>> Draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls has two days left o
I think this draft ready to go as well. I know that Owen has prototyped
it, and I'd like to see it advance.
Eliot
On 23.09.2024 21:01, Peter Yee wrote:
Draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls has two days left on its WGLC. One response was
received and it didn’t really speak to the quality of the do
Draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls has two days left on its WGLC. One response was
received and it didn’t really speak to the quality of the document or whether
it should advance. Now’s the time to have your opinion heard. It’s a nice,
short document, so please consider giving it a look over and se
When this document reaches IETF Last Call, RFC 8773 needs to be called out as a
downref. This downref seems fine to me.
Russ
> On Sep 11, 2024, at 4:32 PM, Peter Yee wrote:
>
> Along with draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa, I've placed
> draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls into a WGLC ending on September
