> I am also in favor of adopting EAP-PPT by WG. The charter amendment looks
> good.
+1 also from me
Cheers,
Mark
From: Paresh Sawant
Date: Friday, 11 April 2025 at 06:54
To: Joseph Salowey
Cc: EMU WG
Subject: [Emu] Re: Adoption Call for draft-sawant-eap-ppt
I am also in favor of adopting EAP
I am also in favor of adopting EAP-PPT by WG. The charter amendment looks good.
Thanks,
Paresh Sawant
> On Apr 9, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
>
> This is an adoption call for EAP-PPT
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sawant-eap-ppt/). This draft defines
> an EAP method th
I’m also in favor of adopting EAP-PPT and I’m ok with the charter Joe.
Thanks,
Bart
From: Alan DeKok
Date: Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 13:53
To: Joseph Salowey
Cc: EMU WG
Subject: [Emu] Re: Adoption Call for draft-sawant-eap-ppt
I think I'm OK without any modifications. Thanks.
> On Apr 9,
I think I'm OK without any modifications. Thanks.
> On Apr 9, 2025, at 6:07 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> [Joe] We have an item from the last charter revision:
>
> "While TLS-based EAP mechanisms provide strong channel protections, if the
> client does not authenticate and validate the server'
