On May 21, 2024, at 4:11 PM, Orie Steele wrote:
> Send Result TLV if all are optional and all are understood, and send NAK TLV
> if all are optional and any are not understood?
>
> The goal is to make the expected behavior clear, and not leave the response
> up to the peer.
>
> The options are
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 12:11 PM Alan DeKok
wrote:
> On May 20, 2024, at 8:12 PM, Orie Steele
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:24 PM Alan DeKok
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "It MUST only send a NAK TLV for a TLV which is marked mandatory."
> >>
> >
> > It MUST send a NAK TLV for any TLV which
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the EAP Method Update (EMU) WG of the IETF.
Title: Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1
Author: Alan DeKok
Name:draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17.txt
Pages: 111
Dates:
On May 20, 2024, at 8:12 PM, Orie Steele wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:24 PM Alan DeKok
> wrote:
>>
>> "It MUST only send a NAK TLV for a TLV which is marked mandatory."
>>
>
> It MUST send a NAK TLV for any TLV which is marked mandatory but not
> understood?
Yes.
>> If all TLVs i
