Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread Sam Sokolik
and and... If the receiver shape is just scaled along its taper - then the work is done with the hal component.. But would we be that lucky? sam On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:46 PM andy pugh wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 00:36, Sam Sokolik wrote: > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/23bEsKMNJH0

Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread andy pugh
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 00:36, Sam Sokolik wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/23bEsKMNJH0 Indeed. Making Capto receivers would be an ideal way to show off with LinuxCNC. We just need that pesky equation. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the

Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread Sam Sokolik
Having a decently high count encoder on the spindle - you don't need a 'servo' spindle.. You can do fancy stuff like... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/23bEsKMNJH0 > In that event, stretch the definition of spindle to include drives > similar to the A drive on the G0704, or the B drive on my 6

Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 13:19, Adam McLeod wrote: > > If > you search "capto iso polygon shank" in duckduckgo search engine right > now, you may find that there is a "preview" of that standard in a pdf > that probably has the details you're looking for near the top of the > search results. I have

Re: [Emc-users] Outside of machine limit bug?

2024-01-02 Thread Andy Pugh
> On 2 Jan 2024, at 20:10, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote: > > ? There should be a re-check box. I don’t understand why nobody else can see it. ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-

Re: [Emc-users] Outside of machine limit bug?

2024-01-02 Thread Nicklas SB Karlsson
? tis 2024-01-02 klockan 10:18 + skrev Andy Pugh: > ___ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc

[Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread Roland Jollivet
And here is a Capto profile being ground; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALRAiiMxTnk Roland On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 18:02, gene heskett wrote: > On 1/2/24 08:17, Adam McLeod wrote: > > Fortunately, Sandvik standardized the Capto shank via ISO 26623. It is > > called a "Polygonal taper interfac

Re: [Emc-users] PCIe parallel port card suggestion

2024-01-02 Thread Todd Zuercher
Meant to say; The onboard (built in) parallel port of a mother board isn't a PCI device so lspci -v won't show anything about it. This command should show your built in parallel port address. cat /proc/ioports | grep parport Todd Zuercher P. Graham Dunn Inc. 630 Henry Street Dalton, Ohio 44618 Ph

Re: [Emc-users] PCIe parallel port card suggestion

2024-01-02 Thread Todd Zuercher
The onboard (built in) parallel port of a mother board isn't a PCI device so won't show anything about it. This command should show your built in parallel port address. cat /proc/ioports | grep parport Todd Zuercher P. Graham Dunn Inc. 630 Henry Street Dalton, Ohio 44618 Phone: (330)828-2105ext

Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread gene heskett
On 1/2/24 08:17, Adam McLeod wrote: Fortunately, Sandvik standardized the Capto shank via ISO 26623. It is called a "Polygonal taper interface with flange contact surface".  If you search "capto iso polygon shank" in duckduckgo search engine right now, you may find that there is a "preview" of

Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread Adam McLeod
Sorry, I meant to include the actual angle: 1°26'21" +/-25" On 2024-01-02 8:03 a.m., Adam McLeod wrote: Fortunately, Sandvik standardized the Capto shank via ISO 26623. It is called a "Polygonal taper interface with flange contact surface".  If you search "capto iso polygon shank" in duckduckgo

Re: [Emc-users] Capto

2024-01-02 Thread Adam McLeod
Fortunately, Sandvik standardized the Capto shank via ISO 26623. It is called a "Polygonal taper interface with flange contact surface".  If you search "capto iso polygon shank" in duckduckgo search engine right now, you may find that there is a "preview" of that standard in a pdf that probably

Re: [Emc-users] PCIe parallel port card suggestion

2024-01-02 Thread Tomaz T .
>But; why doesn’t the onboard port work? It really would be expected to. lspci - did not return any useful information about onboard lpt dmesg did: [5.032598] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver [5.036312] parport_pc 00:01: reported by Plug and Play ACPI [5.036380] parport0: PC-sty

Re: [Emc-users] Outside of machine limit bug?

2024-01-02 Thread Andy Pugh
___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] PCIe parallel port card suggestion

2024-01-02 Thread Andy Pugh
> On 1 Jan 2024, at 19:50, Tomaz T. wrote: > > I'm using Universal PWM Controller from Pico, this should work OK together? No, that requires an actual EPP parallel port. The Mesa card would replace the PPMC board. But; why doesn’t the onboard port work? It really would be expected to. __