On Sunday 04 April 2010, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Sunday 04 April 2010, Chris Radek wrote:
>>In Jeff's absence, I've built the EMC 2.3.5 release for
>>Ubuntu Dapper 6.06. It is now available.
>>
>>Chris
>
>Great Chris. Is that 'backtrace' memory leak fix in it? That thing is
>killing me right now
What is the general consensus for using a thin net client for a frontend?
I am curious if something like a Compaq T30 would be OK for use with a
DVB-S backend. I am only interested in SD, so what would be the
recomendations? Regards Noel
-
What is the general consensus for using a thin net client for a frontend?
I am curious if something like a Compaq T30 would be OK for use with a
DVB-S backend. I am only interested in SD, so what would be the
recomendations? Regards Noel
-
What is the general consensus for using a thin net client for a frontend?
I am curious if something like a Compaq T30 would be OK for use with a
DVB-S backend. I am only interested in SD, so what would be the
recomendations? Regards Noel
-
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 10:33:11PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Great Chris. Is that 'backtrace' memory leak fix in it? That thing is
> killing me right now.
You can always find the release notes here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Released
and in this case the one we hope help
On Sunday 04 April 2010, Chris Radek wrote:
>In Jeff's absence, I've built the EMC 2.3.5 release for
>Ubuntu Dapper 6.06. It is now available.
>
>Chris
>
Great Chris. Is that 'backtrace' memory leak fix in it? That thing is
killing me right now.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be use
In Jeff's absence, I've built the EMC 2.3.5 release for
Ubuntu Dapper 6.06. It is now available.
Chris
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactiv
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 20:26 -0400, Jared Harvey wrote:
> Hello emc-users,
>
> First post here. I've been reading the archive
> e-mail, web pages, and forums. I haven't found an
> answer yet. So I guess it's time to send an
> e-mail.
>
> I have a mild problem with axis. After homing t
Hello emc-users,
First post here. I've been reading the archive
e-mail, web pages, and forums. I haven't found an
answer yet. So I guess it's time to send an
e-mail.
I have a mild problem with axis. After homing the
machine, the cross hair indicators appear overlaid
on the number t
Hi
I am looking for most simple timer that can break 12V circuit(5-60 second
ON, 20-60 seconds OFF) and repeat it continuously.
I know about 555 but i could not find assembled timer ready to use.
I have used PLC from A&B but it too complex for what i want to do.
thanks
Aram
--
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 10:32 -0500, Ray Henry wrote:
> I confess, in the case of tkemc and mini, the backplotter does not erase
> overlapping points when running a repeat of the same tool path. It
> simply adds the new data to the plot so you wind up with many spots
> stacked on top of each other.
On Sunday 04 April 2010, Ray Henry wrote:
>Oh. And I should confirm that Dave does leave the backplot display on
>for hours, I'd say days! I know these things because I once drove a
>thousand miles out of my way to visit him. He wasn't home but looking
>through the shop window I could see TkEmc
On Sunday 04 April 2010, dave wrote:
>On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 23:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 03 April 2010, Dave Caroline wrote:
>> >384meg is a bit on the low side, open a terminal and type
>> >top
>> >look at %wa should be 0 if its a high percentage its probably using
>> >swap memo
Oh. And I should confirm that Dave does leave the backplot display on
for hours, I'd say days! I know these things because I once drove a
thousand miles out of my way to visit him. He wasn't home but looking
through the shop window I could see TkEmc and the backplotter up on his
screen. I kne
I confess, in the case of tkemc and mini, the backplotter does not erase
overlapping points when running a repeat of the same tool path. It
simply adds the new data to the plot so you wind up with many spots
stacked on top of each other. It is not a memory leak, just an ever
enlarging file. I s
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 23:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010, Dave Caroline wrote:
> >384meg is a bit on the low side, open a terminal and type
> >top
> >look at %wa should be 0 if its a high percentage its probably using
> >swap memory...and that is a speed killer
> >
> >Dave
16 matches
Mail list logo
