Re: Time to dial back the dialectic? [was: Re: Privileges and practicalities]

2021-10-06 Thread Richard Stallman
ilosophical level we compete with them. > I presume NonGNU Elpa was your idea, and it was the right one. I have a feeling that you've probably misunderstood the purpose of NonGNU ELPA, but since you have not given specifics, I can't really tell. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://st

Re: Ligature support

2021-11-19 Thread Richard Stallman
e in a way that avoids the SIL font license? It is better to avoid that if possible. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Ligature support

2021-11-20 Thread Richard Stallman
ont license? > > It is better to avoid that if possible. > It looks like that, yes. I'll make sure to specifically avoid the SIL > font license when possible in my in-development library icons.el. It is desirable to avoid the SIL font license, but it isn't crucial.

Re: Ligature support

2021-11-21 Thread Richard Stallman
ed? The problem is described explicily in the item in https://gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html. It is not disastrous, but it is annoying. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet

Re: On Contributing To Emacs

2022-01-01 Thread Richard Stallman
ssignment than it is for Emacs. I agree completely. Those developers made a grave, foolish mistake. I wish I could have stopped them. I will do everything within my power to prevent more such mistakes. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https:/

Re: emacs-devel/debbugs communication (was: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode)

2023-09-04 Thread Richard Stallman
uld be changed, and their comments about the specific method of implementing that change? We might be able to get better at that, since I expect everyone will agree it is good to do that if one can. I'll reply to #2 privately. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance o

Re: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm)

2023-09-08 Thread Richard Stallman
re. The situation with TeX is that way. But what they are doing makes it SaaSS all the way. It's legitimate to offer a service of virtual servers on which you can run your choice of system and software. But systems and software that you can't extract from those particular virtual servers a

Re: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm)

2023-09-08 Thread Richard Stallman
contrast, ChatGTP is neither a community project nor free/libre. That's perhaps why it arranges to manipulate people into "contributing" rather than letting them choose. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Fo

Re: Collaborative training of Libre LLMs (was: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm))

2023-09-09 Thread Richard Stallman
particular platform to modify and run the model have the feasible freedom of copying their modified versions off that platform and onto any other platform that satisfies the specs needed to run these models. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project

Re: [OT] Not clobbering bash history

2023-12-06 Thread Richard Stallman
ared history file approach to the one-history-per-process approach? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) --- via emacs-tangents

Re: [OT] Not clobbering bash history

2023-12-07 Thread Richard Stallman
s decides to do the same, one of their > new history entries would be lost due to the other one overriding it. > This would be a bug. Only if they share one single history file. If each has its own history file, each can handle it as if it were your only Bash process. -- Dr Richard St

Re: [OT] Not clobbering bash history

2023-12-07 Thread Richard Stallman
at by default, as it's > currently the default. It seems fine to support both modes and let each user choose. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-

Re: Hardware respecting your freedom

2020-10-22 Thread Richard Stallman
d 2000, it was free. The issue with KDE, as of 1998, was that Qt was nonfree. At some point Qt was made free. I don't know whether that had happened by 2000. Maybe a few years after. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Softwar

Re: Hardware respecting your freedom

2020-10-23 Thread Richard Stallman
ther free desktop. GNOME was the response. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Hardware respecting your freedom

2020-10-24 Thread Richard Stallman
essTif not an > alternative because of LGPL license, or some other reason? LeesTif was a fine replacement for Motif. However, to untrap KDE, we needed a replacement for Qt. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-07 Thread Richard Stallman
o include only free packages but show them in all distros. Our site could be frepology.org. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
n express your recommendations in ways that contribute to our work rather than hampering it. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
ions. The situation is clear. People have different positions because they start from different goals and values. There is no need to rehash it. Just because it's a tangent does not mean we need to discuss it. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
at would aid per free software work. So if using repology.org helps you work on Emacs, by all means use it. (Did anyone here say you shouldn't?) But we shouldn't refer _the public_ to repology.org. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Softw

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
you command. The issue about repology.org is not about that. It is whether we should tell the public about its existence, for instance by including in Emacs a program specifically aimed at that site. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Softw

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
guistic misunderstanding here. "Legitimate" can mean "legitimate according to the law" or "legitimate according to standards of right and wrong". I generally use it in the latter sense, and I think you do too. Maybe Eli applied the first interpretation. -- Dr Richard S

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
ther companies or individuals control > my data. This looks like a miscommnuication to me. I think that what you are arguing against may not be what the other person meant. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https:

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
tuğ, I suggest reading ttps://gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html to see what our goals and values are. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
software in the Free World, on GNU. The last part of your message seems to be a lot of vituperation. If you have such a low opinion of our efforts, nobody insists you have to participate. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
ree program, we lead per to surrender freedom to it. Therefore we try to avoid that. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
the GNU Coding Standards. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
that the Debian developers and the Gentoo developers are honest and follow their moral codes. We don't mean to criticize them as people. We try to make this clear in gnu.org/distros. If you see anything there which is not clear, please write me privately and show me the text you mean. --

Re: frepology.org

2021-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Would someone like to volunteer to set up frepology.org? -- Dr Richard Sta

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-09 Thread Richard Stallman
s. There are many reasons we might not put a package into GNU ELPA even though it is sometimes useful for people. I will write to you about this privately on Monday. Tomorrow I have an all-day meeting. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Softwar

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-09 Thread Richard Stallman
do this part of my job with GNU-endorsed free software > is a major blow. On Monday could you explain that to me? It isn't obvious. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-09 Thread Richard Stallman
ct it given this information, then telling per is harmless. Otherwise, the question is no so simple. That leaves a lot to say about the other issues raised. I can't do it today. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https:/

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-10 Thread Richard Stallman
o > read or interact with non free software since non free software > can't even be mentioned by GNU software. Have you ever visited a web site that is not mentioned in your browser's documentation or in Emacs? I would expect you have. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisan

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-10 Thread Richard Stallman
you'll see that it is practical and clear. You might still disagree with it, but at least you'll be disagreeing with something real. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-10 Thread Richard Stallman
convince me, you have to show you understand what I'm saying, then point out a problem so I can agree it is a problem. Bludgeoning me with sarcasm only vents your hostility, and that doesn't mean I'm wrong. I am asking various people to be less strident, not only you. -- Dr Richard S

Re: frepology.org

2021-01-10 Thread Richard Stallman
would have no problem with setting it up as long as repology.org > provides all pieces of free software available. It seem to be the case. Would you, please? I think that would resolve some tensions now. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Found

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
could be > made if make GNU OS (Linux based) more attractive to more > people. Of course, we try to do that. It is easier said than done. There is no way to do it in general -- only various ways to do a lit of it in specific. Those depend on volunteers who want to work on it. -- Dr Richard

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
emn an act without condemning the person who does it. Nuances like that are important. To simplify them away would result in being too harsh on the people. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
it means. However, I can tell you what the GNU Project says. The GNU Project never condemns people for using nonfree software and never tries to insist that people must use exclusively free software. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Softwar

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
e going to use it. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
t a crucial issue, as long as it is not meant for anyone to change it. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
whether its in Emacs or not, you can tell it to look at whichever site you like. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-12 Thread Richard Stallman
situations which present the same kinds of factors differ in how significant each factor is. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-12 Thread Richard Stallman
#x27;re arguing very hard about some issue, but I can't follow which issue, and I don't think it is the issue I was talking about. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

2021-01-12 Thread Richard Stallman
. I think was emphatically saying they were making a foolish choice, a weak choice. That's true -- but there's no use condemning people for not being more courageous. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fs

Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

2021-01-12 Thread Richard Stallman
tware in hardware? I've told you my general views on appliances with nonfree software in them. If you want to take a different stance, that's up to you. I don't have time to argue about that issue this week. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)

Re: Require "this program is free software .... " notice to be preserved on the splash screen

2021-02-14 Thread Richard Stallman
t; 7.4.? I think I misread it before. Sorry. Section 7.4 says it is possible to add to the license of a program a clause saying to preserve a specific notice. We could do that, but I am not sure it is wise. Let's ask the Spacemacs developers to cooperate. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief

Re: Help building Pen.el (GPT for emacs)

2021-07-23 Thread Richard Stallman
icensing > compliance. >From what I have read, it seems that the behavior of copilot runs on a spectrum from the first description to the second description. I expect that in many cases, nothing copyrightable has been copied, but in some cases copilot does copy a substantial amount from

Re: Help building Pen.el (GPT for emacs)

2021-07-24 Thread Richard Stallman
. We don't use the slogan "open source" because we want to advocate freedom, not forget it. See https://gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html for more explanation of the difference between free software and open source. See also https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-me

Re: Help building Pen.el (GPT for emacs)

2021-07-24 Thread Richard Stallman
for > copyright purposes as the new author cannot know which part of the > code has used "rare" verbatim. I think that is correct. Falling into this pit may be unusual, but that doesn't make it painless. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of th

Re: Help building Pen.el (GPT for emacs)

2021-07-25 Thread Richard Stallman
that means. If it is something to be viewed, how can I do so? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [emacs-tangents] What was ever truly innovated by some of Large Language Models?

2025-05-02 Thread Richard Stallman
is. I did not expect the "virtual assistant" to know such things, so I did not try. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethallof

Re: [emacs-tangents] Please rename trusted-content ... to trusted-code

2025-02-18 Thread Richard Stallman
love it too. Have you read stallman.org/puns.html? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) --- via emacs-tangents mailing list

Re: [emacs-tangents] What was ever truly innovated by some of Large Language Models?

2025-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
upposition that they are equivalent in capabilities. We do not know how the human brain is organized or how it works, We DO know how an LLM is organized and how it works. We know some things that they inherently can't do and humans can do. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief