[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I moved this to emacs-tangents because thus isn't really about Emacs,
but I don't kno
On 2023-12-06, at 21:49, Richard Stallman wrote:
> That makes a kind of sense, but what I would envision is that each
> Bash process has its own history with only the commands of that process.
>
> Why do you prefer the shared history file approach
> to the one-history-per-process approach?
Isn'
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 12:40, wrote:
> Isn't it obvious? If I have several terminals open at the same time
> (and I seldom have fewer than, say, three, usually more), sharing
> history is very useful. It easy to remember that I issued some kind of
> command, but much more difficult to remember i
mbork wrote:
>> That makes a kind of sense, but what I would envision is
>> that each Bash process has its own history with only the
>> commands of that process.
>>
>> Why do you prefer the shared history file approach to the
>> one-history-per-process approach?
>
> Isn't it obvious? If I have sev
Yuri Khan wrote:
>> Isn't it obvious? If I have several terminals open at the
>> same time (and I seldom have fewer than, say, three,
>> usually more), sharing history is very useful. It easy to
>> remember that I issued some kind of command, but much more
>> difficult to remember in which termina
