Arthur Miller writes:
>>> IMNSHO, discussing a rewrite of Emacs in _any_ language is waste of
>>> time and energy. We've seen this many times (because people still
>>> insist on bringing this up from time to time). From where I stand,
>>> the main reason is not even the fact that we decided not
joakim wrote:
>>> Gnus refreshes slowly, maybe that could be helped with
>>> concurrency, but it could also be helped with more async
>>> work in gnus.
>>
>> Concurrency can help you keep reading messages while Gnus
>> refreshes in parallel, but it won't easily help you refresh
>> faster, unless s
Emanuel Berg writes:
> joakim wrote:
>
Gnus refreshes slowly, maybe that could be helped with
concurrency, but it could also be helped with more async
work in gnus.
>>>
>>> Concurrency can help you keep reading messages while Gnus
>>> refreshes in parallel, but it won't easily help
> From: Arthur Miller
> Cc: Gerd Möllmann ,
> e...@thyrsus.com,
> r...@gnu.org, drew.ad...@oracle.com, a...@muc.de, luang...@yahoo.com,
> emacs-tangents@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 21:58:43 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > [Redirected to emacs-tangents]
> >
> >> From: Gerd Mö
[Moving reply to e-tangents.]
> > I would not object to using keyword arguments for functions
> > like that -- complex and cumbersome to use, and not used often.
>
> Well, than we pretty much agree 100% about keyword args.
+1.
Except maybe for the "not used often". Depends on the
"often" use.
On Wednesday, 13 Sep 2023 at 07:05, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> How many do people have, for it to get slow?
It's not just the number of groups etc. but also what servers you need
to access. The latter is not specifically an issue with gnus in that
any other MUA would suffer as well; the problem is tha
