Collaborative training of Libre LLMs (was: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm))

2023-09-09 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Richard Stallman writes: > 1. In Wikipedia, a contributor voluntarily chooses to participate in editing, > Editing participation is separate from consulting the encyclopedia. This > fits the word "collaborating. > > By contrast, a when the develoers of ChatGTP make it learn from the > user, that

Re: Collaborative training of Libre LLMs (was: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm))

2023-09-09 Thread Jean Louis
* Ihor Radchenko [2023-09-09 13:28]: > > By contrast, ChatGTP is neither a community project nor free/libre. > > That's perhaps why it arranges to manipulate people into "contributing" > > rather than letting them choose. > > Indeed, they do hold coercive power as people have no choice to copy ru

Re: Collaborative training of Libre LLMs (was: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm))

2023-09-09 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > However, if the "patching" technology can only serve a single "patch" + > main

Re: Collaborative training of Libre LLMs (was: Is ChatGTP SaaSS? (was: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: llm))

2023-09-09 Thread Debanjum Singh Solanky
> > However, if the "patching" technology can only serve a single "patch" + > > main model, there is a problem. Improving libre neural networks will > > become difficult, unless people utilize collaborative server to > > continuously improve a model. > > > Such collaborative server, simil