Re: (*) -> 1

2023-01-22 Thread Jean Louis
* Emanuel Berg [2023-01-22 08:55]: > Tassilo Horn wrote: > > > In my book, it is useful to have mathematically sound > > behavior by default. If you have a reason to handle some > > edge-cases differently in some application (which is totally > > possible!), then define your own function which do

Re: (*) -> 1

2023-01-22 Thread Emanuel Berg
Jean Louis wrote: >>> In my book, it is useful to have mathematically sound >>> behavior by default. If you have a reason to handle some >>> edge-cases differently in some application (which is >>> totally possible!), then define your own function which >>> does what you wish. >> >> Your book? Ac

Re: (*) -> 1

2023-01-22 Thread Akib Azmain Turja
Emanuel Berg writes: > Tassilo Horn wrote: > >> In my book, it is useful to have mathematically sound >> behavior by default. If you have a reason to handle some >> edge-cases differently in some application (which is totally >> possible!), then define your own function which does what >> you wis

Re: (*) -> 1

2023-01-22 Thread Emanuel Berg
Akib Azmain Turja wrote: >>> In my book, it is useful to have mathematically sound >>> behavior by default. If you have a reason to handle some >>> edge-cases differently in some application (which is >>> totally possible!), then define your own function which >>> does what you wish. >> >> Your bo

RE: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1

2023-01-22 Thread Drew Adams
> > (*) → "sex" > The No. 1 thing to some people ... We pretty much _all_ depend on it. Until we start cloning people or we develop human parthenogeny. (There's in vitro fertilization, but you still need two sexes there.) Oh, sorry, didn't mean to leave out the miracle of virgin birth. Miracle