Re: [Emacs-orgmode] GTD, Projects, and Next Actions in org-mode

2006-08-10 Thread Tim O Callaghan
Thinking of next actions this morning while cycling to work, made me wonder if it is possible to vet your org mode outlines. By vet, I mean check for consistency. For example, in my case, asking agenda to give me a list of projects that have actions associated with them that are not next actions.

[Emacs-orgmode] how do people use publish?

2006-08-18 Thread Tim O Callaghan
I'm considering using Org mode for publishing my TODO's, I was wondering that kind of templates others are using? Tim. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

[Orgmode] Bug in 4.53 and 4.54

2006-11-10 Thread Tim O Callaghan
trying to call org-todo-list fails if calendar has not been loaded. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function calendar-gregorian-from-absolute) calendar-gregorian-from-absolute(732625) org-todo-list(nil) call-interactively(org-todo-list) This happens under Xemacs. Tim. ___

Re: [Orgmode] meta & esc

2006-11-10 Thread Tim O Callaghan
> Hi, > > Another basic question, but should there be equivalent ESC key > bindings for all of the Meta key bindings? I know the binding for M-S-RET > doesn't seem to work. In checkbox/bullet lists, I get a bullet but no checkbox and the checkbox counters don't update. I can go through and

Re: [Orgmode] meta & esc

2006-11-10 Thread Tim O Callaghan
> I'm fine with the bindings except I don't have a meta and there are > quite a few apps at work that seem to like Alt the way it is. I'm > little nervous about remapping ALT for all of X. I haven't found a > way to tell just emacs to consider ALT a Meta. > > Edd > As far as i'm aware, ESC has a

Re: [Orgmode] meta & esc

2006-11-10 Thread Tim O Callaghan
> I'm fine with the bindings except I don't have a meta and there are > quite a few apps at work that seem to like Alt the way it is. I'm > little nervous about remapping ALT for all of X. I haven't found a > way to tell just emacs to consider ALT a Meta. > > Edd > ooops, missed this obvious one: