Richard Lawrence berkeley.edu> writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just came across this site, which looks really interesting:
>
> http://beeminder.com/about
>
> They provide a service for tracking progress toward (quanitifiable)
> goals, and they show you a graph that includes:
>
> - your actual
bugs and patches via the "answers"-interface.
By this, maybe at least some of the maintenance tasks can be distributed
more evenly among people who would occasionaly check out a few lines of
code but who don't feel familiar enough with lisp an a large scale.
Just a thought...
Hello,
I have been using Orgmode for the last two years. In fact, I started learning
Emacs only to use orgmode (btw: a huge thank you to Carsten and the other
contributors!).
I noticed that - as more people with a diverse range of background knowledge
start to use orgmode - the mailing list is ge
Jambunathan K gmail.com> writes:
>
> The biggest diasadvantage would be fragmentation of information.
>
> All information needs to have authoritative sources and archives. I
> believe the info manual, GNU mailing list and the Orgmode.org domain (of
> which Worg is but a part) are the right pla
@ Bastien, Jason
thank you for your response!
I made a proposal to stackexchange.com for a dedicated Org-mode site but
they rejected it as a duplicate of stackoverflow. So this option is out.
Nevertheless, I still think it would be nice to have something like this for
Org-mode only.
We could in
Hello list,
after reading the responses to my initial suggestion yesterday
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/44582) I've set up a
proposal on are51.stackexchange.com for a SE-site that is dedicated to
Org-mode only.
Think something like http://tex.stackexchange.com solely for Org-mod
Try M-x org-toc-show in your active org buffer.
You may have to activate org-toc in your org modules.
Cheers,
Thomas
> I have made a decision not to merge org-lparse, org-xhtml & org-odt in
> to Orgmode core. It is a very difficult decision for me to take
> considering that I had put all my heart in to it. (Btw, this decision
> has nothing to with me not having enough time at hand.)
>
> I leave it up to the
>
> However, I started noticing I was getting lost in my own system. This
> is partly because I still don't have the habit of reviewing it all
> very often, but I also found out that my main gtd.org file (the one
> that has projects and next actions/tasks) was getting really long. I
> know I coul
