I have multiple savings accounts, some of which I want to partition into
mutiple virtual "subaccounts" that don't merit their own savings account. I
want to use org-mode tables to keep track how much money is each
subaccount. Given the following table:
#+TBLNAME: trans-150925
| ! | Amount | From
Sorry forgot to put in a subject
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Shankar Rao wrote:
> I have multiple savings accounts, some of which I want to partition into
> mutiple virtual "subaccounts" that don't merit their own savings account. I
> want to use org-mode table
could write a recursive formula, but that would propagate one row at a
time. Even org-table-iterate (C-u C-u C-c * on any table cell) would have
to be called more than once, since it stops after 10 iterations.
Shankar Rao
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:35 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the fo
Heading B ...
Shankar Rao
I'm trying to use to org-capture insert tables into a datetree that I use
to manage my finances. Below is the capture template I set up for it. Is
there a way to make the table be aligned after I finalize the capture?
Shankar
-
(setq org-capture-templates
'(...
("f" "Add Tables" plain
Oops.
(set org-capture-templates '(...
should be
(set org-capture-templates `(...
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Shankar Rao writes:
>
> > I'm trying to use to org-capture insert tables into a datetree that I
> use to manage my finances. Belo
For the following org capture template:
(setq org-capture-templates
'(("d" "Date Tree Test" plain
(file+datetree+prompt "~/org/testdt.org")
"This date should be the date i picked: %<%y%m%d>")))
Though this is filed under the correct date in the datetree, no matter what
date I select in the
ut still use the current time for other capture types. Will this solution
break anything?
Shankar
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Shankar Rao writes:
>
> > For the following org capture template:
> >
> > (setq org-capture-templates
> > &
Looks like a similar issue was addressed earlier here:
http://sachachua.com/blog/2015/02/org-mode-reusing-date-file-datetree-prompt/
Shankar
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Shankar Rao wrote:
> Earlier in org-capture-fill-template, there is the following:
>
> (let* (...
>
roup-tag is set to t
(the default).
Shankar Rao
Aquamacs 3.2 GNU Emacs 24.4.51.2
Org 8.2.10
-- begin example
#+STARTUP: overview
#+TAGS: [ agroup : foo baz ]
#+TAGS: [ bgroup : bar ]
#+TAGS: [ cgroup ]
#+TAGS: [ dgroup : gah ]
#+TAGS: [ egroup : doh meh ]
* T
Hello all,
I discovered that upgrading to 9.5 broke my configuration because the
variable `org-speed-commands-user' was removed. I read the thread
(https://list.orgmode.org/87v9hzzhrn@gmail.com/) where this change
was proposed and I completely agree that exposing the whole set of
`org-speeds-c
Thank you for the tip. I didn't realize that `member' could be used in
this way to insert an element at a particular point in a list. But
this doesn't address the main issue in my post, that the user has two
different approaches for adding commands to `org-speed-commands'
depending on whether it is
me speed commands without having to
understand the structure and organization of `org-speed-commands'.
Shankar
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:36 AM Shankar Rao wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I discovered that upgrading to 9.5 broke my configuration because the
> variable `org-speed
ve to be concerned with
whether or not a given key is already present in
``org-speed-commands''.
I agree that ``org-speed-command-add'' has undefined behavior when
provided with only a descriptive headline as its first element. Would
you be more amenable to this command if it e
g, but have not yet received a
response.
Shankar Rao
---
lisp/org.el | 98 +++--
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
index 7ff7ec685..870c5c958 100644
--- a/lisp/org.el
+++ b/lisp/org.el
@@ -3644,6
2020 at 4:14 PM Shankar Rao wrote:
> * lisp/org.el:
> (org-auto-emphasis-unhide-at-point): Parameter that controls the
> behavior of Org Auto Emphasis mode. It can be one of the values nil, t,
> and
> 'right-edge, and works similarly to the parameter
> `prettify-symbols-u
ont-lock-extra-managed-props
+'(org-emph-start org-emph-end)))
+ (when org-auto-emphasis-unhide-at-point
+ (add-hook 'post-command-hook
+#'org-auto-emphasis--post-command-hook nil t))
+(font-lock-flush))
+;; Turn of
> Sorry for being late to the party, but, IMO, this doesn't sound like
> a right approach to the problem of invisible emphasis markers. A user
> choosing to hide emphasis markers should not need to—or even be given
> the opportunity to—display them in order to edit them efficiently.
>
I agree that
nd manipulate
this text. The ability to switch between these two modalities is extremely
powerful and is what sets Org apart from other document editing systems.
> Allow me to polish up my draft a bit, so we can compare the benefits of
> each system.
>
I look forward to seeing your proposed system more concretely.
Shankar Rao
Thank you for your hard work on this. It's definitely easier to compare two
concrete blocks of code rather than abstract ideas.
> I agree with you that my solution is somewhat intrusive. Ideally, I would
> > have preferred that my solution could leverage advice functions or some
> Org
> > hook, so
an option for this to
org-agenda-prefix-format, since this modifies the heading text
rather than the prefix.
If people agree that this feature is of broad interest, and have
suggestions on a good configuration interface, I would be happy
to submit this as a patch.
Shankar Rao
21 matches
Mail list logo
