Org-protocol browser extensions avoiding use of bookmarklets

2025-01-07 Thread Rehan Deen
I just came across this extension: https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/1hvtlsa/the_new_and_only_orgprotocol_chrome_extension_you/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/emacs-paw/ Do you think this meets some of your needs and avoids the security issues you've raised?

Re: [BUG] Org-protocol bookmarklets in Firefox behaving badly after recent upgrade [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.4/lisp/org/)]

2024-12-28 Thread Rehan Deen
Max Nikulin writes: > Have you considered reporting a bug to Firefox? > > I have tried year old versions of Chromium and Firefox and have > realized that e.g. javascript:a="test" consistently replaces document > content. Chromium still discards expression value in the case of > assignment to "loca

[BUG] Org-protocol bookmarklets in Firefox behaving badly after recent upgrade [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.4/lisp/org/)]

2024-12-12 Thread Rehan Deen
Hello all, After upgrading Firefox to version 133.0-1 on Manjaro Linux, I find that that my Org-protocol bookmarklets in Firefox are not working properly. Namely, after I click on them to capture a link or some text, the information is copied appropriately but the browser switches from displaying

Re: [BUG] Org-protocol bookmarklets in Firefox behaving badly after recent upgrade [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.4/lisp/org/)]

2024-12-12 Thread Rehan Deen
Start of forwarded message From: Rehan Deen To: Max Nikulin Subject: Re: [BUG] Org-protocol bookmarklets in Firefox behaving badly after recent upgrade [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.4/lisp/org/)] > Try to add "(void)"

Re: [BUG] Org-protocol bookmarklets in Firefox behaving badly after recent upgrade [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.4/lisp/org/)]

2024-12-12 Thread Rehan Deen
> Please, reply to the list. Apologies. > I hope, you used the full expression instead of ellipsis. Yes, I doubt it would have "worked" otherwise (in the sense that the link would not have been captured). > I forgot about > "+new", so it should be with another variant of parenthesis: >