for other tramp-related
stuff.
Thanks
Felipe>From e902f40842a20baa0c4a2ca462b83d9ce949a19f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Lema <1232306+felipel...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:34:53 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Squashed commit of the following:
commit 6ea888f4
F papers are approved now.
Gards, Felipe
[1]: https://github.com/FelipeLema/emacs-counsel-gtags/blame/
5d2a8c2c2d358e374a576cf8a3a67f7997a8839b/.travis.yml#L6
On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 16:14:05 -03 Bastien wrote:
> Hi Felipe and Jack,
>
> > Felipe Lema writes:
> >> I
Sup, y'all
I started using guile with Org Babel and I was a little confused that errors
weren't being reported. The attached patch will report the error the same way
as python evaluation does.
Actually, most of the code was taken from ob-python.el
Let me know if I'm missing anything so this ca
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 20.07.01 -03 Rudolf Adamkovič wrote:
> Felipe Lema writes:
>
> > Sup, y'all
> >
> > I started using guile with Org Babel […]
>
> Sup! I plan to write some literate Scheme soon as well. How do you find
> the experience so far?
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 11.54.33 -03 Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Felipe Lema writes:
>
> > I started using guile with Org Babel and I was a little confused that
> > errors weren't being reported. The attached patch will report the error the
> > same way as pyt
I just realized I was un-CCed out of the thread
Here's the updated patch with the requested changes (actually single one)
Lemme know if I'm missing anything else.
Felipediff --git a/lisp/org/ob-scheme.el b/lisp/org/ob-scheme.el
index f4836b23fe..8720bd099e 100644
--- a/lisp/org/ob-scheme.el
+++
Sup, y'all
The geiser package had a recent update in which `geiser-eval-region` behaves
like an async function and does not return evaluation result. In exchange, the
newly introduced `geiser-eval-region/wait` does that now.
I've attached a patch to update ob-scheme.el to reflect these changes.
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 15.03.47 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
> Sup, y'all
>
> The geiser package had a recent update in which `geiser-eval-region` behaves
> like an async function and does not return evaluation result. In exchange,
> the newly introduced `geiser-eval-re
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 22:50:20 +07 Max Nikulin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 22.53.18 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 15.03.47 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
> > > Sup, y'all
> > >
> > > The geiser package had a r
I'm Ok with this patch.
Haven't tested it myself, but looks good otherwise (probably Tim has
been using it for quite a while now)
Felipe
On 2022-04-23 09:29, Tim Van den Langenbergh wrote:
Felipe,
I have taken the liberty of reformatting the patch you created for ob-scheme.
You can find i
On 2022-04-30 06:35, Neil Jerram wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 09:14, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Felipe Lema writes:
I just realized I was un-CCed out of the thread
Here's the updated patch with the requested changes (actually single one)
Lemme know if I'm missing anything else
11 matches
Mail list logo
