There's been some talk about quotation marks when exporting to LaTeX,
but I've noticed some issues in addition (I think) to those mentioned
by others.
"'a quote' inside a quote"
is exported to LaTeX as
``'a quote' inside a quote''
but should be
``\,`a quote' inside a quote''
Simila
"Sven Bretfeld" writes:
> The different styles of quotation marks needed for different languages
> might also be a problem for a regexp solution. I'm using the \enquote
> method since quite a while and write English and German text in that way
> without further user interference. \enquote just pi
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:00 PM, Don March wrote:
>
>> Implementing the \enquote solution proposed by Sven Bretfeld
>
> Could you please point me to that earlier discussion? I cannot
> find it right now.
>
Sure--"[feature request] Quotation ma
-0d>
#+END_EXAMPLE
From 5401da2076b9de890fbf086e472c09c3f0a66fdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Don March
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:05:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Make today's deadlines "close" without lead time
* org.el (org-deadline-close): A timestamp is close if the days between
now and the timestamp are le
includes the original changes and the new
tests---is attached. While I was in there, I made a second patch that renames
the function to have a `-p' predicate suffix.
Hopefully I put the tests somewhere close to where they belong.
From 4953e495b938011582fb0c7c7bf9064530ce9294 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
t affect
the current behavior--the task will still be rescheduled on the next occurrence
on some future day.
From 59328aa0089bb376df86c89128a741a59d41c378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Don March
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:35:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Reschedule "++" repeaters on same day if
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Don March writes:
>> If you have a task with the following timestamp:
>>
>> SCHEDULED: <2016-06-19 Sun 21:00 ++1w>
>>
>> then marking it as DONE at [2016-06-27 at 07:00] should [...]
> ISYM [2016-06-26 at 07:00].
Yes :)
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Would you mind providing a note about this change in ORG-NEWS?
No problem. Would you put that in "new features" or "miscellaneous"?
Here is a patch with that addition to ORG-NEWS.
From 18d0d67f7f0efd635351056c185b46e2c2a54d5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Don March
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 02:39:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ORG-NEWS: document last "++" repeater change
---
etc/ORG-NEWS | 9 +
1 file changed, 9
