Dear All,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 11:55, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> See the attached updated version of the patch with all your comments
> addressed.
Thanks Ihor, the patch looks good to me now!
best wishes,
András
On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 21:16, Colin Baxter wrote:
> Thanks, so presumably I just use set-face-attribute.
For many/most face aspects, I find the customize interface the easiest
to use. Simply
M-x customize-face RET org-table-row RET
(and then probably click on "Show all attributes").
You can
Rens Oliemans writes:
>> Before I install the patches, may I know if you have FSF copyright
>> assignment? See https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#copyright
>
> I had not done that yet. I have just sent the form to the FSF. I will let
> you know when the process is complete.
It has been
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> It has been one month since the last activity in this thread.
> May I know if you got any reply from FSF?
I did, I got and signed the assignment, on Friday the 10th of May. I will get a
reply of
the FSF once they have signed it, and will post here when that happens.
Be
Dear All,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 19:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> > since bibtex and biblatex requires title fields to be in title case
> Are you sure? AFAIK, bibtex and biblatex (depending on the bibstyle)
> does not care about capitalization and instead applies its own, unless
> the title expli
On 13/05/2024 17:07, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
However, there are still some issues remaining.
When updating timestamps repeating monthly across months with 30, 31,
and 28 days we get
<2025-01-31 Fri +1m>
<2025-02-28 Fri +1m>
<2025-03-28 Fri +1m>
...
<2026-01-28 Wed +1m>
Instead of using timestam
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 13/05/2024 17:07, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>
>> However, there are still some issues remaining.
>> When updating timestamps repeating monthly across months with 30, 31,
>> and 28 days we get
>>
>> <2025-01-31 Fri +1m>
>> <2025-02-28 Fri +1m>
>> <2025-03-28 Fri +1m>
>> ...
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> This is not possible because of how `org-auto-repeat-maybe' is
> designed. When repeater is triggered, the original date in the
> timestamp is replaced with future date. So, we have no access to the
> original date in the timestamp.
And even if we would have access to th
Thanks for the patch, it looks good and is an improvement over the
somewhat terse previous version. I do have some thoughts though so will
chime in. Note that I am not a native speaker, it might be best if we get
extra eyes from a(nother?) native speaker.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> +While [[*Hyper
Hi,
I've noticed after upgrading to the latest Org version (9.6.30), when the
LOGBOOK drawer is automatically generated during a TODO state change it inserts
a blank line after the end of the drawer. This did not occur on the Org version
I was using previously (9.5.5).
I'm not sure if this is
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
11 matches
Mail list logo
