On 22.01.2024 19:59, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes:
FR: would it be possible to resolve such links?
What is the purpose? Why not simply leaving the result name same as
the
source block?
I have Python "IN" blocks generating Python "OUT" blocks that may end
up
Dear All,
I'm sending you some updates to the ORG manual.
I'm sorry there's a lot of changes in this one patch.
If it's too much, I think I could break the changes into two commits:
First, move the 'Checkboxes' section under 'TODO Items' to '2 Document
Structure' -> '2.6 Plain Lists' -> '2.6.2 Ch
Thank you for asking.
Yes, I would be interested.
I will prepare a patch.
Regards,
Sławomir Grochowski
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:47 PM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > I think that your use-case is not necessarily common enough to change
> > the
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> It has been a while since the last update in this thread.
> Ilya, do you need any help with the patch?
Hi, here is the updated patch.
>From 2385ba08a89f2966a6d71f92e8693e7def33e3fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Chernyshov
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:33:56 +0600
Sub
On 22.01.2024 19:59, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes:
FR: would it be possible to resolve such links?
What is the purpose? Why not simply leaving the result name same as
the
source block?
I have Python "IN" blocks generating Python "OUT" blocks that may end
up
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
In December last year was a change introduced, that a file should not be
removed before
tangling (https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-orgmode/2021-05/msg00337.html).
In an older bug report
(https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-orgmode/2021-05/msg00337.html)
the decision was to remove the file before writing.
I
