To quote from the Org Manual:
"Org greatly simplifies the use of outlines by compressing the entire show
and hide functionalities into a single command, org-cycle, which is bound
to the TAB key."
Well, it could simplify things a good deal further if, on issuing the
command when point is *not* on a
Hi Philipp,
On Friday, 28 Apr 2023 at 10:49, Philipp Kiefer wrote:
> Well, it could simplify things a good deal further if, on issuing the
> command when point is *not* on a parent heading, (non-global)
> org-cycle would instead fold the subtree that point is in, i. e. do
> 'outline-up-heading' an
Mehmet Tekman writes:
> Ruijie Yu writes:
>
>> Great idea! Some inline comments below.
>>
>> You only need to say #'expand-file-name instead of the quoted lambda.
>> Also, you need to set the variable, otherwise the variable
>> `org-babel-tangle-sync-files' is undefined.
>>
>> What I have in
Ruijie Yu writes:
> Thanks. Can you make a full patch from the current main branch to your
> changes, with a commit message and so on? This would help reviewers to
> look at the full picture of what are modified. Take a look at the
> manpage git-format-patch(1) if you aren't sure how to do it.
Hi,
I want what may be two conflicting things:
- Produce a monolithic HTML export of an main org file that #+include:'s
other org files.
- Have links in the other org files that are valid both when the
monolith is exported to HTML and when visiting the individual org
files in Emacs.
Below
Thanks, Eric, I am aware of customization options.
My suggestion was aimed at improving the out-of-the-box experience of (new)
Org users by extending the usefulness of 'org-cycle' by folding the subtree
at point from anywhere inside it that is not itself a parent item rather
than doing nothing at
Ihor,
I do not like lengthy emacs commands and make functions to generate
them. I think, it is better to move such code to a script. A proof of
concept is attached, however it is rather rough draft
./epm.el -Q --epm-dir $(emacs_pkgdir)/emacs-%e install compat
./epm.el -Q -L ~/src/comp
Dear Compeers,
Some months ago there had been a discussion about using org-mode
to produce package documentation. Which would allow the use of
Latex3 (e.g. use of colour, floating images).
What is the current status for that?
Christopher
Christopher Dimech writes:
> Dear Compeers,
>
> Some months ago there had been a discussion about using org-mode
> to produce package documentation. Which would allow the use of
> Latex3 (e.g. use of colour, floating images).
Where/when did this happen? Could you provide a few pointers?
> W
Philipp Kiefer writes:
> Thanks, Eric, I am aware of customization options.
>
> My suggestion was aimed at improving the out-of-the-box experience of (new)
> Org users by extending the usefulness of 'org-cycle' by
> folding the subtree at point from anywhere inside it that is not itself a
> pa
Hello Doctor.
> That said: C-c C-t or M-x outline-hide-body
C-c C-t
is org-todo, not outline-hide-body.
Thanks for the clarification.
Esteban Ordóñez writes:
> Hello Doctor.
>
>> That said: C-c C-t or M-x outline-hide-body
>
> C-c C-t
> is org-todo, not outline-hide-body.
I guess I customized that …
> Thanks for the clarification.
Glad to :-)
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
d
n.b. org-link-minor-mode exists, works, and i find it useful. i think
it could use updating, but it is indispensible.
btw i have not tried embark yet. i wonder if it could do something
similar, or maybe it doesn't fontify.
meanwhile, for years now i'm finding that i am wanting a new link-like
a
13 matches
Mail list logo
