I have file debug3.org which contains only
* strange
#+begin_export latex
\[
\text{a_b}
\]
#+end_export
Upon latex export (C-c C-e l o) the generated pdf shows a sequence of
4 "a subscript b" in a row (with 3 font sizes).
Result observed with various Org versions includin
On Tuesday, 29 Nov 2022 at 11:28, alain.coch...@unistra.fr wrote:
>#+begin_export latex
>\[
> \text{a_b}
>\]
>#+end_export
You cannot use a subscript within \text{}. Try \text{a}_{\text{b}}
instead?
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.5-1068-gbd4681 in Emacs 29.0.50
Fraga, Eric writes on Tue 29 Nov 2022 10:40:
> You cannot use a subscript within \text{}.
Yes. My point was that Org did not spot this mistake and generates
something ridiculous.
--
EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre)
ITE (Institut Terre & Environnement) | alain.coch...@un
On Tuesday, 29 Nov 2022 at 12:11, alain.coch...@unistra.fr wrote:
> Yes. My point was that Org did not spot this mistake and generates
> something ridiculous.
Ah, okay. I think having the expectation that org will parse within
LaTeX blocks may be a little unrealistic. But, also, what should it
Fraga, Eric writes on Tue 29 Nov 2022 11:16:
> I think having the expectation that org will parse within LaTeX
> blocks may be a little unrealistic.
Org, no, but (pdf)latex yes.
> But, also, what should it do?
I would expect that the mistake be reported in the *Org PDF LaTeX
Output* Compilat
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes on Tue 29 Nov 2022 12:33:
> I would expect that the mistake be reported in the *Org PDF LaTeX
> Output* Compilation buffer. So far, what I saw in that buffer was
> essentially what shows up when I run 'pdflatex org_generated_file.tex'
> from a terminal. Not th
Hi!
I wanted to chime in here, because sometimes I do have a similar
problem.
Whenever I export to LaTeX + PDF, it is pretty difficult to see if the
compilation actually worked (or not). This is, because the compilation
happens asynchronously, and so, the message about the compilation
results in
Same problem here -- seeing mistakes in latex/pdf generation.
i
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dominik Schrempf
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I wanted to chime in here, because sometimes I do have a similar
> problem.
>
> Whenever I export to LaTeX + PDF, it is pretty difficult to see if the
> compilation
Attached is an example
1. Open all headings etc. show the contents then Collapse all headings
2. Cycle First Heading to show its content
3. Cycle Second Heading to show only the subheadings, but not the
content of each subheading
3. Cycle Subheading B, to show its content.
4. go to point-min an
On 26/11/2022 09:05, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
This sounds like something to be adapted to Emacs upstream.
I suggested to change `string-collate-lessp' fallback behaviour to use
`downcase' when IGNORE-CASE is non-nil. See my last message in
bug#59275.
I do not share Eli's posit
On Saturday, November 26th, 2022 at 04:26, Ihor Radchenko
wrote:
> yuvallangerontheroad yuvallangeronther...@proton.me writes:
>
> > > Extra [...] are redundant.
> > > Please test the patch before submitting.
> >
> > Sorry. Removed redundant brackets.
>
>
> Thanks.
:)
> It is also a good
Den tis 29 nov. 2022 kl 06:20 skrev Bill Burdick :
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 2:11 AM Henrik Frisk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Maybe I'm missing something obvious but is it possible to have a name be
>> added to the result block such as running:
>>
>> #+begin_src shell
>> echo "Hello"
>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Contributions for other languages are also welcome.
Slovak:
("sk" "Súbor" "L" "Časová značka" "Záhlavie" "Čas" "VŠETKO" "Celkový
čas" "Čas súboru" "Časový súhrn pre")
Rudy
--
"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration."
-- Thomas Alva Edison, 1932
Rudolf Adamkovi
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Hmm. Maybe not displaying message at all?
Agreed. Please, see the updated patch.
Rudy
>From 0c04ca6dec740a5aba7d1934a4d59578ea98ed4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rudolf=20Adamkovi=C4=8D?=
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 22:10:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ob-core: Rem
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> Agreed. Please, see the updated patch.
Oops, I dropped an important word in the commit message.
Please see the third version of patch below.
Rudy
>From c3896ead3e46d705bc4fbee143df87016fe70389 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rudolf=20Adamkovi=C4=8D?=
Date
On Tue, November 22 2022 02:23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> It looks like you have done something very close to what we are
> discussing. Would you be interested to create a patch against Org core
> instead of relying on advises?
That would be wonderful! That code has some ugly hacks, some of which
16 matches
Mail list logo
