Arthur Miller writes:
> I haven't tested the updated version of JK's proposal, but looking at the
> source
> it seems to be a tad bit resource heavy. If it isn't a hassle for the OP to
> use
> aliases like lt, gt or similar, I would suggest that either using macros or
> simple defalias to ren
Tim Cross writes:
> Arthur Miller writes:
>
>> I haven't tested the updated version of JK's proposal, but looking at the
>> source
>> it seems to be a tad bit resource heavy. If it isn't a hassle for the OP to
>> use
>> aliases like lt, gt or similar, I would suggest that either using macros o
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> On 28/08/2021 14:07, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>> I wonder if it is possible to get org table formulas to respect
>> numeric locale.
>
> Even to add some functions to Emacs that respect numeric locales, it
> is necessary to use e.g. dynamic modules
>> Emacs documentation says th
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
Ryan Scott writes:
> It might make sense to fix up inserted "file:" links that are under the
> attachment directory to be "attachment:" style links by default anyway, no?
> Then just being able to set the working directory to the attachment
> directory easily would get the rest of the way there.
TRS-80 writes:
> I was thinking about incorporating some handling of these entries into
> a custom archival function. Which would also handle some other things
> at the same time. But so far, it's just some notes and thoughts about
> desired functionality and how it might work. And I keep moni
Yeah your second example is what I'm thinking. It makes this all a fairly
concise extension of that existing mechanism and does away with the file
move after execution.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021, 06:21 Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ryan Scott writes:
>
> > It might make sense to fix up inserted "file:" lin
No Wayman writes:
> Allen Li writes:
>> The question here is, which behavior do we want? My philosphy
>> is that
>> programs shouldn't try to silently re-interpret the user's
>> intentions.
>> For example, if I accidentally mistyped the tag "green_blue" as
>> "green-blue", I don't want Org to
hi, all.
Arthur Miller wrote:
> Well, in this case it is a tool deficiency, if you don't like gt, than use
> use "greater-than", it can't be more clear intent? After all, this is a lisp,
> and
> '>' is just a symbol name, like any other. For the inclusion of code, yes, but
> that is why we have
