Re: bug#44824: [PATCH] org.el: Avoid xdg-open silent failure

2021-02-19 Thread Maxim Nikulin
On 18/02/2021 21:48, Eli Zaretskii wrote: From: Maxim Nikulin Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:56:03 +0700 I could not estimate effect of such change on windows, so pipe process is used only on linux. I am unsure concerning mac however. On Windows Emacs always uses pipes, because we don't have PTYs t

Re: [feature request] The :pre header argument

2021-02-19 Thread Rodrigo Morales
You can read this message with proper formatting here ( https://codeberg.org/rdrg109/gists/src/branch/main/the-pre-header-argument.org ). On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 16:52, Rodrigo Morales wrote: > > This message contains my thoughts on a feature request which I think > would be useful: The =:pre= he

wrong-type-argument stringp nil

2021-02-19 Thread Colin Baxter
Hello, I getting the Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) when I 'C-c C-c' the babel gnuplot source code "poynting", even though the pdf graph is produced correctly. Any help at debugging would be much appreciated. #+name: poynting | i | R |P/M | | 0 | 0.0400 | 0.4000 | | 20 |

bug#44824: [PATCH] org.el: Avoid xdg-open silent failure

2021-02-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Maxim Nikulin > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:29:49 +0700 > Cc: 44...@debbugs.gnu.org > > > On Windows Emacs always uses pipes, because we don't have PTYs there. > > And there's no xdg-open on MS-Windows anyway, so it's a moot point. > > Should I consider your response as a suggestion to rem

Re: wrong-type-argument stringp nil

2021-02-19 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Friday, 19 Feb 2021 at 14:11, Colin Baxter wrote: > I getting the Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) when I 'C-c > C-c' the babel gnuplot source code "poynting", even though the pdf graph > is produced correctly. Any help at debugging would be much appreciated. Works fine for me. No

Re: wrong-type-argument stringp nil

2021-02-19 Thread Colin Baxter
Dear Eric, > Eric S Fraga writes: > On Friday, 19 Feb 2021 at 14:11, Colin Baxter wrote: >> I getting the Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) when >> I 'C-c C-c' the babel gnuplot source code "poynting", even though >> the pdf graph is produced correctly. Any help at

Re: bug#44824: [PATCH] org.el: Avoid xdg-open silent failure

2021-02-19 Thread Maxim Nikulin
On 19/02/2021 21:54, Eli Zaretskii wrote: From: Maxim Nikulin Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:29:49 +0700 On Windows Emacs always uses pipes, because we don't have PTYs there. And there's no xdg-open on MS-Windows anyway, so it's a moot point. Should I consider your response as a suggestion to remo

noweb expansion when eval and not tangle?

2021-02-19 Thread George Mauer
I would like noweb to expand during eval but *not* tangle. Is this possible? I realize I can achieve the same effect with multiple code blocks but it seems an odd asymmetry to not be able to do this directly. Is it possible and just not documented?

filling quoted email in org does not infer a fill prefix

2021-02-19 Thread Samuel Wales
i'd like to fill things like this > asdfka sdfnl akjs dnflkajs ndfkjasdn kfj ansdkj nfaksjdfn > sadj nflakjs ndfklaj ndsfkjans dkfjna skdjfn aklsjd nfkajdnsf in org. i always had no problem with it, and when i did, i could use filladapt, with a little alist change from long ago. but recentl

Bug: exporting a subtree to icalendar omits body of subtree [9.3 (release_9.3 @ /usr/share/emacs/27.1/lisp/org/)]

2021-02-19 Thread Stephen Eglen
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.

Re: [feature request] The :pre header argument

2021-02-19 Thread Rodrigo Morales
I've provided more relevant information on this feature request [[ https://codeberg.org/rdrg109/gists/src/branch/main/feature-request-pre-header-argument.org][here]]. Please consider reading that instead of the first message on this thread. On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 08:33, Rodrigo Morales wrote: >

Re: noweb expansion when eval and not tangle?

2021-02-19 Thread Timothy
George Mauer writes: > I would like noweb to expand during eval but *not* tangle. Is this possible? > > I realize I can achieve the same effect with multiple code blocks but it > seems an odd asymmetry to not be able to do this directly. > > Is it possible and just not documented? It is indeed