Not really worried about which alternative is chosen. I was just
exhibiting my inner compulsive nature... ;-)
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.2.6-544-gd215c3
Thanks for the reply Eric. The thing I like about the newlines is that the
generated tex files are slightly easier to read. However, this is really
minor. I've created 2 separate patches: one keeping the newlines and the
other without. I'm happy to defer to you or anyone else in regard to which
is
One thing I forgot to mention in the previous thread (apologies if it
was already mentioned, I didn't see it) is you could try git-annex. The
android version does rely on termux as its runtime, but interacting with
it is through a local web server, so if use of termux for initial setup
is an option
Hello,
I just noticed that the recent updates regarding the bracket link escaping
syntax seem to have an issue.
Does anybody happen to know how to put a pair of [] around a link without using
"zero width space" or something similar?
For example,
[[[https://somewhere-to-url][My Link]]] does not
John Kitchin writes:
> If you like ivy, you might find this helpful:
Also see counsel-org-goto and counsel-org-goto-all, which provide
similar capability.
> Fraga, Eric writes:
>
>> On Wednesday, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:26, Matt Price wrote:
>>> Is there a quasi-equivalent of ~org-id-goto~ or
>>> ~o
Greetings.
It seems that when a file with global properties is included, the global
properties are not inherited. Is this a bug or a feature?
Consider the two files inlined below:
# -- file 'included.org' ---
#+property: MY_INCLUDED_PROPERTY some
On Thu 05 Dec 2019, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Pankaj Jangid writes:
>
>> C-c TAB is working but earlier the behaviour was to apply
>> directive by default on next electric formatting. Has the behaviour
>> changed in 9.3?
>
> 9.2, I believe, more specifically 6d6a30d4c (org-table: Implement shrunk
> co
Hello,
Yesterday I asked this question on IRC and the community kindly
answered. I was also asked to send an email to the mailing list
explaining my use case. Thus this email.
So, in the scope of my current project at work I need to see if Neo4J would
be a valid alternative to PostgreSQL to sto
I'm experiencing incorrect and seemingly inconsistent behavior when nesting
`\begin` `\end` environments inside `\(\)` or `$$`. For example, the
following is valid latex code:
```
\(\begin{aligned}
b_n &= \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\pi} x \sin{\left(nx\right)}dx \\
b_0 &= 0 \\
\int_{0}^{\pi} udv &= \l
Hello,
Kiwon Um writes:
> I just noticed that the recent updates regarding the bracket link escaping
> syntax seem to have an issue.
>
> Does anybody happen to know how to put a pair of [] around a link without
> using "zero width space" or something similar?
> For example,
> [[[https://somewh
Hello,
Andy Moreton writes:
> This is still a regression.
>
> The old behaviour allowed display of fixed width columns, even if that
> is wider than the content of cells in that column. This is useful for
> display of several related tables with aligned column dividers.
>
> How do I get the old
Hello,
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> I find current behaviour inconvenient, because I want to set common
> global properties for a large number of files, and I can not currently
> do this via an included file.
What happens if you use SETUPFILE instead?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hello,
Thank you for the reply.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:33 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Kiwon Um writes:
>
> > I just noticed that the recent updates regarding the bracket link escaping
> > syntax seem to have an issue.
> >
> > Does anybody happen to know how to put a pair of [] around a link
Kiwon Um writes:
> I didn't know what the issue in the past interpretation was, but I am
> just not sure whether it's a good idea to enforce that we must use
> such a special character, which we cannot directly see from the
> editor.
This is because you are using an ambiguous construct. There ar
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 10:10 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Kiwon Um writes:
>
> > I didn't know what the issue in the past interpretation was, but I am
> > just not sure whether it's a good idea to enforce that we must use
> > such a special character, which we cannot directly see from the
> > ed
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> I find current behaviour inconvenient, because I want to set common
>> global properties for a large number of files, and I can not currently
>> do this via an included file.
>
> What happens if you use SETUPFILE instead?
It works perfectly.
Please find attached a pa
Greetings.
Please find attached a patch that adds the point of the source code
block to the message shown to user when confirming the evaluation of the
block.
In large org-files, I have often trouble figuring out which code block
Org is confirming me to evaluate when exporting. This is especiall
17 matches
Mail list logo
