On 15/10/18 21:20, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Frederic Gilbert writes:
Following an upgrade from 8.2.10 to 9.1.14 from GIT repository,
it looks like tables column width specifications (e.g. <10> on a row)
don't work anymore.
Could you explain what doesn't work?
Regards,
Sorry for not
Hello list,
I finally tracked down the problem. It is not related to my use of
latexmk. It is an Imagemagick problem. The version installed by xubuntu
18.04 has a restrictive policy on pdf files. I tweaked the
'/etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml' file which contains the following policy
restriction :
On Tuesday, 16 Oct 2018 at 10:04, Éric Würbel wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I finally tracked down the problem. It is not related to my use of
> latexmk. It is an Imagemagick problem. The version installed by xubuntu
> 18.04 has a restrictive policy on pdf files. I tweaked the
> '/etc/ImageMagick-6/poli
Le 16/10/2018 à 09:18 GMT, Eric S Fraga a dit:
> On Tuesday, 16 Oct 2018 at 10:04, Éric Würbel wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I finally tracked down the problem. It is not related to my use of
>> latexmk. It is an Imagemagick problem. The version installed by xubuntu
>> 18.04 has a restrictive policy
Hello,
I found myself in a situation to
smerge-ediff with three windows
split inside a frame.
There was another tiny frame with
a question mark which I didn’t do
anything to. Maybe I had to.
I had tried to git merge and there
were conflicts needing attention.
Looking at the file in smerg
On Tuesday, 16 Oct 2018 at 11:46, Éric Würbel wrote:
> I think that this problem is very specific to the following case :
> - LaTeX SRC block
> - needed translation of this block into a png (and perhaps svg) image
> - preprocessing with pdflatex, so we end up with a pdf->png conversion.
It is spec
I should add I was in an emacs without
the .emacs customization to allow TAB
to cycle the headline visability which
explains why I could not do that, but
why C-x 5 0 was refused is a puzzle.
> Looking at the file in smerge-mode
> and then calling smerge-ediff
> produced my Org-Mode buffer
>
Hello,
Frederic Gilbert writes:
> To limit the width of the first column (which can be much longer than
> the example, and push the 2 other columns beyond the frame's width), I
> am used to use the width specification, as in:
>
>| Title |+ | - |
>
On 16/10/18 13:43, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Use in the first column. It is a change introduced in Org 9.2.
Thank you, I expected this kind of change but could not find about it in
the docs.
Regards.
Would it be useful to begin integrating into babel functions so to
serialize lisp objects (just as prin1-to-string) in other languages?
I’ve read some babel files trying to do that, independently of each
others (that’s a lot of similar `typecase's (seeing it I’m regretting
each type-spec in it can
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> my understanding is that code that runs with lexical-binding enabled
>> is generally faster.
>
> Not really. But it's certainly easier to understand since it removes one
> class of problems.
>From what I've read, the byte-compiler can optimize better when
lexical-bindi
Hi Marcin,
That sounds very geekily interesting. :) I imagine Sacha Chua might be
interested as well, although she already has a sophisticated system for
her Quantified Life stuff.
I'd be interested in looking at your code. For several years I've used
a "pomodoro"-like shell script to help sta
Thanks for sharing that, John. Glad to see John (the other one) getting
more recognition for his work!
This might be going the opposite direction, but I worked on a way to make
it easier to digest the output of Python in elisp, in these two posts:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/05/16/Python-data-structures-to-lisp/
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2016/05/30/Writing-lisp-code-fro
On 10/14/18, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> But I decided it's not worth it. Very complicated and unreliable (I
> might have two or more clocking tasks related to the same file, for
> example).
hm, it doesn't seem so to me. what do you mean by 2 or more related
to the same file? a file can have any
On 2018-10-16 at 16:59, John Kitchin wrote:
> This might be going the opposite direction, but I worked on a way to make
> it easier to digest the output of Python in elisp, in these two posts:
>
> http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/05/16/Python-data-structures-to-lisp/
> http://kitchingrou
Thanks for bringing me into the conversation! :) I'm so far from that
sort of thing right now. Rough activity tracking by buttons and voice
shortcuts on my phone is all I can manage with a toddler around.
Marcin, I wonder if you might like to adapt some code from
sachachua.com/dotemacs for clo
17 matches
Mail list logo
