[O] [RFC] Slight change for the tag user interface

Hi! I just glanced at the user interface for editing tags. It looks like this: [a-z..]:Toggle [SPC]:clear [RET]:accept [TAB]:free [!] no groups [C-c]:multi I think [a-z..]:toggle [SPC]:clear [RET]:accept [TAB]:edit [!] no groups [C-c]:multi would be nicer. ("Toggle" -> "toggle", "free" -> "e

Re: [O] [RFC] Slight change for the tag user interface

Sounds good to me. Carsten On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Marco Wahl wrote: > Hi! > > I just glanced at the user interface for editing tags. It looks like > this: > > [a-z..]:Toggle [SPC]:clear [RET]:accept [TAB]:free [!] no groups > [C-c]:multi > > I think > > [a-z..]:toggle [SPC]:clear [R

[O] Scheme output results

I don't think that Scheme output results are correctly handled. Please consider: #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :results output (display "a") (newline) (display "b") (newline) (display "c") (newline) '(a b c) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: : "a\nb\nc\n" As compared with the Elisp equivalent: #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :res

[O] exporting inline source code with listings broken by color commands

When exporting an org file to pdf via latex, and using the listings package to markup source code, my inline code is not processed properly. To reproduce: emacs -Q -l minimal.el where minimal.el contains the following: ;;; Minimal setup to load latest 'org-mode' ;; activate debugging (set

Re: [O] [RFC] Slight change for the tag user interface

>> [a-z..]:Toggle [SPC]:clear [RET]:accept [TAB]:free [!] no groups >> [C-c]:multi >> >> I think >> >> [a-z..]:toggle [SPC]:clear [RET]:accept [TAB]:edit [!] no groups >> [C-c]:multi >> >> would be nicer. ("Toggle" -> "toggle", "free" -> "edit") >> >> WDYT? > Sounds good to me. Thanks! I pushed