Hi,
Thanks for the comments.
> -- lisp/org doc/misc/org.texi etc/refcards/orgcard.tex etc/ORG-NEWS etc/org
> \
> etc/schema/od-manifest-schema-v1.2-os.rnc etc/schema/od-schema-v1.2-os.rnc
That's better.
>> +- =org.texi= :: Copy to =emacs/doc/misc=. It may be necessary to replace,
>> +
Indeed, thanks to you and to everyone involved.
I'm very grateful everyone has been patiently baring
with me for this task.
--
Bastien
Hi Robert,
first of all, my bad: what I should have said in all these discussion
is that any decision regarding moving Org to Emacs' core won't happen
any time soon (I'd say two or three years).
Keeping Emacs master branch in sync with Org maint branch is not a
problem anymore, so the decision of
Great! It just works!
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Bug: Clock table reports wrong data [9.0.9]
> Local Time: July 4, 2017 12:20 AM
> UTC Time: July 3, 2017 10:20 PM
> From: m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr
> To: Pierre-Henr
On Monday, 3 Jul 2017 at 18:58, ed...@openmail.cc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if someone can help me, please.
>
> 1. I currently have a file called
> code-blocks.org. Let us say that it has something
> like this:
[...]
> - [-] This does not work
>
> If I do C-c in the foll
>> possibility of evaluating the code to test and see what happens?
>
> Often, but not always. And it would be seriously annoying to have the
> session buffer pop up every time I wanted to browse the code in a src block
> while simultaneously viewing the results of a previous invocation in
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Hi Philip,
>
> phillip.l...@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes:
>
>> I presume you do see this as an advantage? The issue is, surely,
>> that it's too much of a PITA for the advantage that you gain?
>
> Well, it's not really about PITA-or-not-PITA, it's just that I want
Tim Cross writes:
> Just to throw my 2 cents in.
>
> While I can understand the benefits of being able to easily install the
> latest org package via elpa, I think there are some significant benefits
> to org being a part of core Emacs.
>
> I currently find three issues with the current situation
Tim Cross writes:
>> I don't see how that would possible once it is integrated in GNU emacs
>> core, there will be no separate makefile or anything of that sort, but
>> maybe I am missing something.
>>
>
> There is going to have to be a way for people to maintain and build org
> independently. Wh
Hi.
Just a minor bug; I think. The W3C validator complains that the document
is invalid for the which is nenerated when there's a #+SUBTITLE: :
end tag for "br" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
You may have neglected to close an element, or perhaps you meant to
"self-close" an eleme
Hi Olivier,
Olivier Berger writes:
> Just a minor bug; I think. The W3C validator complains that the document
> is invalid for the which is nenerated when there's a #+SUBTITLE: :
>
> end tag for "br" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
>
> You may have neglected to close an element, or
Sorry to send this question again:
> Are there cases where %\1 ... %\N would be used *outside* of a string in a
> template?
Jean-Christophe
> On Jun 30, 2017, at 20:04, Jean-Christophe Helary
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 30, 2017, at 18:47, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>
>> Jean-Christophe Helary
12 matches
Mail list logo
