Hello,
Kaushal Modi writes:
> Thanks. I pushed the patch, but I missed making the when -> and change. Do
> you want me to fix that in another commit? Though, functionally they are
> the same, and 'make test' is passing.
As I said, I was only nitpicking. Feel free to fix it, or not.
Regards,
-
Hello,
Chunyang Xu writes:
> Currently 'C-c C-v C-t' ('org-babel-tangle') simply overrides existing
> tangle-file, I would like org to ask me what to do? such as
>
> a) yes (override)
> b) no (don't override)
> c) show the diff then ask again
>
> In addition, if there is no diff (i.e., having th
Hello Nicolas,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017, 3:16 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
>
> As I said, I was only nitpicking. Feel free to fix it, or not.
>
OK, thanks for confirming. I'll leave out this edit then.
> --
Kaushal Modi
I have a habit that I'd like to perform every day or so in the lead up
to an event, but after the event date I would like to be marked
permanently done and never again appear in the agenda.
Is there a way to do this automatically? I've tried with a combination
of scheduled and deadlines, but the
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I'm not sure to understand commit
> a023d670eceb9121ef6a511b108fd82265e6d6a8. In particular, why did
> you remove lexical binding? It really should be active in every
> library, and is the default when you create a new one.
I didn't know lexical binding wa
On Saturday, 17 Jun 2017 at 23:13, ed...@openmail.cc wrote:
> What is an ECM and how do I produce it? (this is a honest question).
Sorry: French for minimal but complete example so that others can try to
reproduce the problem. See the FAQ:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html
--
: Eric S Fraga
Hello,
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Still: when it is not used, why adding it?
We are not adding it since it is in the file by default; you removed
it :)
This is an odd question, however. The thing is: how is Emacs-lisp
scoping, dynamic or lexical? We ought not consider it to be both
throughout th
I'm at the stage of building an org-mode table to be exported to
mediawiki and its going to be the front page of my DrugFacts site.
So far I'm here -
--8<---cut here---start->8---
| *Illegal* | *Category's* |*Legal*
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
[...]
> I don't think it is a good idea to have file that can be both edited
> manually, and auto-generated (i.e., tangled). Or, to put it differently,
> the idea behind tangling is that you only handle the code block, not the
> file itself.
I still think overriding exis
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017, Chunyang Xu wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
[...]
I don't think it is a good idea to have file that can be both edited
manually, and auto-generated (i.e., tangled). Or, to put it differently,
the idea behind tangling is that you only handle the code block, not the
file it
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Bastien Guerry writes:
>
>> Still: when it is not used, why adding it?
>
> We are not adding it since it is in the file by default; you removed
> it :)
I guess it is in the file by default because the odds are good that
lexical scoping will be actually use
Bastien Guerry writes:
> I agree it's good to have lexical scoping, but I don't consider Elisp
> to be lexical scopped -- I consider Elisp to let the user pick up the
> constraints he wants, with dynamic binding still being the default.
Not at all. Lexical binding is still the way to go. If you
Try this to get the heading you want. It seems to work for me.
#
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/17445/how-can-i-change-the-references-to-reference-in-the-thebibliography-environm
# This makes the bibliography section title empty and un-numbered
#+latex: \renewcommand{\bibsection}{\subsec
Hi,
I am curious about how people organize a project and its sub-tasks. For
example, say building a website. Do you make the task a TODO task and
then have TODO tasks under it? I don't like that the project appears in
my org-agenda as a separate thing along with its sub-tasks. How do you
handle th
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> There is absolutely no drawback in using lexical binding. Since Emacs
> 24.1, it _is_ the default for Elisp: every Elisp file created activates
> it, the other binding being for compatibility with older libraries.
Maybe I miss something: when I create a fil
Hi Eric.
The standard clocking task mechanism will do it fine.
Great.
However, since there are many multiple small observations along
one task, maybe a capture template is a bit overdo...
I find that capturing is a lightweight activity. It all depends
on what
you expect to have to do.
Hello,
1. Open the attached org file using emacs -Q org-indent-text.org
I have emacs version "GNU Emacs 25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+
Version 3.22.10) of 2017-04-22" and thus org version 8.2.10
2. Change to a built-in dark theme: (load-theme 'tsdh-dark)
3. SHIFT-TAB a bit, everything lo
"Charles C. Berry" writes:
[...]
> It sounds like you are re-inventing version control and wanting it to be
> implemented in org-babel-tangle.
>
> `org-babel-tangle' can do a lot of work to assemble the files that result
> from tangling. Modifying `org-babel-tangle' to do what you ask would
I found noweb reference with argument `<>` issue.
This can work:
```org
#+NAME: f1
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=7 :results value
(+ x x)
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: f1
: 14
#+NAME: f2
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=7 :results value
(+ x 2)
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: f2
: 9
#+name: intermediate
#+call:
I also think Org-mode table src block content to override file is dangerous.
I have another idea. Append src block content to end of file.
I have a sceniro:
File `dotfile-1.org`:
```
* SSH config 1
#+BEGIN_SRC conf :tangle "~/.ssh/config"
fragment 1
#+END_SRC
```
File `dotfile-2.org`:
```
* SS
On Sunday, 18 Jun 2017 at 20:45, Narendra Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am curious about how people organize a project and its sub-tasks. For
> example, say building a website. Do you make the task a TODO task and
> then have TODO tasks under it? I don't like that the project appears in
> my org-agenda
21 matches
Mail list logo
