Hi all,
Org 9.0 is out! See the release notes here:
http://orgmode.org/Changes.html
Thanks to Nicolas, the non-official but real maintainer
and to all who contributed to this long-awaited release.
As usual, enjoy!
--
Bastien
Hi Kaushal,
Kaushal Modi writes:
> I just noticed that org 9.0 got released yesterday. I am surprised
> that there was no announcement email.
my bad -- I sent the announcement using my non-gnu email address,
so gmane asked me to confirm while I was alseep.
> Thanks to everyone who contributed
I noticed this typo while I was reading the docs,
so I post the fix here.
--- a/lisp/ob-core.el
+++ b/lisp/ob-core.el
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
(defun org-babel--get-vars (params)
"Return the babel variable assignments in PARAMS.
-PARAMS is a quasi-alist of header args, whcih may contain
+PARAMS i
Dear all,
I would like to clean up my Linux setup to be easily replicable. I am
considering keeping everything in one org file, and then tangling files
(e.g. exec scripts, systemd service unit files) and executing bash snippets
(e.g. for installing packages and sed'ing config files). Then one would
Hello,
Zhaocong Jia writes:
> I noticed this typo while I was reading the docs,
> so I post the fix here.
Fixed. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Giacomo M writes:
> Dear all,
> I would like to clean up my Linux setup to be easily replicable. I am
> considering keeping everything in one org file, and then tangling
> files (e.g. exec scripts, systemd service unit files) and executing
> bash snippets (e.g. for installing packages and sed'ing
Thank you Nicolas for fixing it so quickly! Unfortunately now that I can
test it I see a problem with the fix:
When archiving an "ordinary" entry with 'n' empty lines after it there will
be zero empty lines after it (or before it) in the Datetree. However, those
archived in the order described by
Dear Stefan,
thanks for the hints, I wasn't aware of these projects. While they sound
appealing, I would like to stick to my current distribution (archlinux),
for a variety of reasons (e.g. Im updating my raspberry which seems more
supported by arch than nixos, I'm more familiar with it, I like th
you can have a look at here
https://propellor.branchable.com/
It should be possible to use emacs to edit the config.hs file.
Now you need to extend it for arch .
Cheers
Frederic
Hi!
https://github.com/marcowahl/org-ephermal-section-numbers
is a little tool to display the section numbers for a (not too crazy
structured) Org file.
Possibly someone finds this useful.
Ciao,
--
Marco
This sounds cool. Can you please add screenshots to the package README?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:31 AM Marco Wahl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> https://github.com/marcowahl/org-ephermal-section-numbers
>
> is a little tool to display the section numbers for a (not too crazy
> structured) Org file.
>
> Possi
On 3 November 2016, Giacomo M wrote:
I would like to clean up my Linux setup to be easily replicable. I am
considering keeping everything in one org file, and then tangling files
(e.g. exec scripts, systemd service unit files) and executing bash snippets
(e.g. for installing packages and sed'ing
On 2 November 2016, Bastien Guerry wrote:
Org 9.0 is out!
Wonderful news, and I give my sincere thanks to everyone who helped. Org is a
great system. I use it every day and am very happy it exists.
Bill
--
William Denton :: Toronto, Canada :: https://www.miskatonic.org/
Caveat lector.
On Thursday, 3 Nov 2016 at 15:29, Marco Wahl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> https://github.com/marcowahl/org-ephermal-section-numbers
>
> is a little tool to display the section numbers for a (not too crazy
> structured) Org file.
>
> Possibly someone finds this useful.
Interesting. Works well although not ve
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Thursday, 3 Nov 2016 at 15:29, Marco Wahl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> https://github.com/marcowahl/org-ephermal-section-numbers
>>
>> is a little tool to display the section numbers for a (not too crazy
>> structured) Org file.
>>
>> Possibly someone finds this useful.
>
> Inte
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Giacomo M wrote:
>
> Does anybody have experience with this?
Yes. Here is my top level provisioning document at the correct headline:
https://github.com/grettke/osx-provision/blob/master/El-Capitan/provisioning.md#provisioning
And here are all of the tangled fil
Hear, hear!
Thank you maintainers.
Sincerely,
Grant Rettke
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Bastien Guerry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Org 9.0 is out! See the release notes here:
>
> http://orgmode.org/Changes.html
>
> Thanks to Nicolas, the non-official but real maintainer
> and to all who contribu
Hi,
I updated to org 9.0 today via elpa.
Org mode version 9.0 (9.0-elpaplus @
/Users/jkitchin/vc/jkitchin-github/scimax/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20161102/)
I get this message on trying to run an elisp block.
Evaluation of this emacs-lisp code-blockis disabled.
There are two issues:
1. there is a
Thanks to all the contributers. I absolutely live in Org-mode.
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Org 9.0 is out! See the release notes here:
>
> http://orgmode.org/Changes.html
>
> Thanks to Nicolas, the non-official but real maintainer
> and to all who contributed to this long-awaited rele
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Giacomo M wrote:
> Dear Stefan,
>
> thanks for the hints, I wasn't aware of these projects. While they sound
> appealing, I would like to stick to my current distribution (archlinux), for
> a variety of reasons (e.g. Im updating my raspberry which seems more
> suppo
> I get this message on trying to run an elisp block.
>
> Evaluation of this emacs-lisp code-blockis disabled.
>
>
> There are two issues:
> 1. there is a missing space between block and is (and maybe code-block
> should not be hyphenated) in org-babel-check-evaluate
> 2. It used to work! If I run
Hello,
Klarre N writes:
> When archiving an "ordinary" entry with 'n' empty lines after it there will
> be zero empty lines after it (or before it) in the Datetree. However, those
> archived in the order described by my bug report gets n + 1 empty lines
> after them.
Could you provide an ECM?
huh.. it seems to have disappeared. I deleted the orgplus directory in
my elpa directory and reinstalled it, and it seemed to go away.
weird.
Joon Ro writes:
>> I get this message on trying to run an elisp block.
>>
>> Evaluation of this emacs-lisp code-blockis disabled.
>>
>>
>> There are two i
> From: John Kitchin on behalf of John Kitchin
>
>
> huh.. it seems to have disappeared. I deleted the orgplus directory in
> my elpa directory and reinstalled it, and it seemed to go away.
>
> weird.
I can confirm that this worked for me as well - I removed both org and
org-plus-contrib in m
Hi,
After upgrading to org-mode 9.0, I'm getting the same error described here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-05/msg01312.html.
Basically LaTeX export stops with an error - pdflatex complains that it cannot
write .log file, when I export a subtree with EXPORT_FILE_NAME
25 matches
Mail list logo
