On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 08:59, Christian Moe wrote:
> I've never know this to fail as such. I did have a problem for a while
Not sure if this is relevant but just in case...
I had problems with ODT export for quite some time with the default
style. I finally tracked it down to having some o
On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 08:42, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to add to certain messages (which I read via gnus and the
> imap protocol) tags so that searching is simplified. Is there a way to
> do that using the org tags engine? Gnorb would be a candidate but that
> feature is listed
On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 16:35, Peter Davis wrote:
[...]
> Excellent! Thanks to this, I now have great looking JavaScript
> listings, and I can easily change the styling.
For completeness, would you please tell us your solution? I'm sure this
question will come up again at some point...
T
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Really? Did you try `org-babel-mark-block'?
No, thanks for pointing it out to me, it does however not precisely what
I want, but Nic's suggestion does, org-mark-element does.
> HTH,
> Hello,
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> `org-mark-element' (M-h) ?
Precisely what I was looking for, thanks a lot
>>> "Eric" == Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 08:42, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I would like to add to certain messages (which I read via gnus and the
>> imap protocol) tags so that searching is simplified. Is there a way to
>> do that using the org tags
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Yup, I haven't gotten to it, mostly because message tagging is one part
> of a much larger new feature set that I haven't had time to implement
> yet. That, and most of my hacking time has been taken up by a new
> version of BBDB I'm working on -- still part
Hello,
Daniele Nicolodi writes:
> I just tried: going to the beginning of the line with C-a (by default
> bound to org-beginning-of-line in org-mode) puts the cursor in a
> position where you can insert text before the link, without it being
> part of the link description.
Interesting. It doesn
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> [[uri][description]]
>
> is displayed as
>
> [description]
>
> instead of
>
> description
>
> and
>
> [[uri]]
>
> is displayed as
>
> [uri]
>
> instead of
>
> uri
How about showing boundaries only when the cursor is near "hidden" text?
This would also w
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> [[uri][description]]
>
> is displayed as
>
> [description]
>
> instead of
>
> description
>
> and
>
> [[uri]]
>
> is displayed as
>
> [uri]
>
> instead of
>
> uri
How about showing boundaries only when the cursor is near "hidden" text?
This would also w
Hi Nicolas, hi all,
2016ko urriak 13an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
[...]
> Not really. It makes my example more bearable, but using C-a is still
> a workaround, and there are also many other dances to perform in various
> other cases. So, I still think there is an usability issue that need
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> No, I meant for it eval in the *scratch* buffer. It merely shows how it
> might look with a similar mechanism to prettify-symbols-mode. Of course,
> it lacks all care to details that would make it nice.
>
> I suspect it would suffers from the jumping that Nick, and I gu
Hello,
Aaron Ecay writes:
> FWIW, I agree. On the other hand, many people object to the brackets.
I don't mind adding a variable.
> My understanding of the problem is that when link fontification is
> turned on, it is impossible to tell between the two marked positions
> when point is in in a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 04:08 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 16:35, Peter Davis wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Excellent! Thanks to this, I now have great looking JavaScript
> > listings, and I can easily change the styling.
>
> For completeness, would you please tell us your
Hi Nicolas
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Aaron Ecay writes:
>
>> FWIW, I agree. On the other hand, many people object to the brackets.
>
> I don't mind adding a variable.
Or maybe add new value(s) to org-descriptive-links to avoid yet
another defcustom and first o
Hi Clément,
I don’t know if you’ve found a satisfactory solution yet, but I found the
following to work quite well in my case:
;; Define an export function for autoref links
(defun kk/org-autoref-export (path desc format)
"Export an autoref type reference for the given path"
(case fo
Hi
I have effectively the same question as Adm here:
[http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/26412/human-readable-directory-tree-with-org-attach]
I would like to have the directory tree of the attachments managed by
org-attach to reflect the document structure as defined by the
headlines.
To q
Is anyone familiar with using SVG in LaTeX/PDF output? I can find
information on the svg package online, but the problem I'm having may
have to do with org-mode interaction with LaTeX.
Basically, the svg package relies on inkscape to split svg graphics into
a PDF file containing the shapes, and a
Try this instead:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(org-map-entries (lambda () (org-heading-components)) "myproperty<>\"\"")
#+END_SRC
Empty properties get returned as "" not nil I think.
York Zhao writes:
> One more question: how do I map only the entries that has a specific
> property
> defined? The fo
Hi Peter.
> I'm trying to export a LaTeX book (using scrbook style), but I don't
> know how to make chapters. [...]
If you're not too tied to scrbook, the Memoir class is perfect for
books, highly documented and very customizable.
Best...
--
eduardo mercovich
Donde se cruzan tus talentos
Hi Peter.
>> > I have a document with a number of embedded dot graphics [...]
> I've decided to bite the bullet and install InkScape. However, I'm
> having a hard time figuring out how to integrate this with org-mode.
> [...]
I export from Inkscape to pdf and include the pdf file. Would that wor
On Thursday, 13 Oct 2016 at 12:46, Peter Davis wrote:
> NOTE: The prebreak and postbreak definitions just add little red hooks
> to the source block to show me where a line break was added. It's a
> trick I picked up on this list a while ago.
Oh, and thanks for this! This is very useful.
--
: E
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
> Hi Peter.
>
> >> > I have a document with a number of embedded dot graphics [...]
>
> > I've decided to bite the bullet and install InkScape. However, I'm
> > having a hard time figuring out how to integrate this with org-mode.
> > [
On Thursday, 13 Oct 2016 at 12:46, Peter Davis wrote:
>> For completeness, would you please tell us your solution? I'm sure this
>> question will come up again at some point...
>>
>
> Sure thing, Eric. Basically, I just added the following to my org file:
Thanks. Useful to have the definition f
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
> Hi Peter.
>
> > I'm trying to export a LaTeX book (using scrbook style), but I don't
> > know how to make chapters. [...]
>
> If you're not too tied to scrbook, the Memoir class is perfect for
> books, highly documented and very custo
York Zhao writes:
> Thank you very much Nick.
>
> (info "(org) Using the mapping API") was the first doc I read which has very
> little information on how
> to use the "match" parameter. (info "(org) Matching tags and properties")
> does have a lot more detail
> though.
>
Understood - I like
Uwe Brauer writes:
"Eric" == Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 08:42, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I would like to add to certain messages (which I read via gnus and the
>>> imap protocol) tags so that searching is simplified. Is there a way to
Hi All,
I made a PR to add the https://github.com/eggcaker/jekyll-org plugin to
GitHub Pages' whitelist, allowing people to use Orgmode style posts with
GitHub Pages without checking in generated HTML documents. If this
sounds like something you would be interested in, head over to
https://github.
Stig Brautaset writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I made a PR to add the https://github.com/eggcaker/jekyll-org plugin to
> GitHub Pages' whitelist, allowing people to use Orgmode style posts with
> GitHub Pages without checking in generated HTML documents. If this
> sounds like something you would be interes
Rasmus writes:
> Hi,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> [[uri][description]]
>>
>> is displayed as
>>
>> [description]
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> description
>>
>> and
>>
>> [[uri]]
>>
>> is displayed as
>>
>> [uri]
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> uri
>
> How about showing boundaries only when the
On 10/13/16 8:14 AM, John Kitchin wrote:
> In org8, this is not that easy to do, but not impossible.
>
> Why do not you want to use [[foo:bar][bar]]?
Hi John,
I'm fine using [[foo:bar][bar]], but it is much longer to type.
Slightly changing my question: there is a way to instruct
org-insert-lin
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos writes:
> I'm worried that this would be computationally prohibitive.
I guess something like ‘prettify-symbols--post-command-hook’ could be
used. When point is within the range of
prettify-symbols--current-symbol-bounds it shows the emphasis marker by
removing the ‘invisibl
On 2016-10-13 12:13, Nick Dokos wrote:
>> >
>> > But when the cursor is next to the link or emphasized text markers are
>> > shown.
>> >
>> > Pre text |[description] post text
>> > Pre text |*bold text* post text
>> >
>> > It would not cause much jumping. Of course, for people who want
Clément Pit--Claudel writes:
> On 2016-10-13 12:13, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>> >
>>> > But when the cursor is next to the link or emphasized text markers are
>>> > shown.
>>> >
>>> > Pre text |[description] post text
>>> > Pre text |*bold text* post text
>>> >
>>> > It would not cause much
On 10/13/16 6:07 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Does this solve your problem? :)
>
> Not really. It makes my example more bearable, but using C-a is still
> a workaround, and there are also many other dances to perform in various
> other cases. So, I still think there
On 10/13/16 12:02 PM, John Kitchin wrote:
> I do not know if you can do that. I would do something like this.
>
> (defun insert-foo-link (path)
> (interactive "sfoo path: ")
> (insert (format "[[foo:%s][%s]]" path path)))
This has the drawback that it requires a different key-bind, instead
than
Hi Nicolas, org-mode users and developers,
* Nicolas Goaziou [13. Okt. 2016]:
> Aaron Ecay writes:
>> My understanding of the problem is that when link fontification is
>> turned on, it is impossible to tell between the two marked positions
>> when point is in in a link like:
>>
>> [[http://goog
I do not know if you can do that. I would do something like this.
(defun insert-foo-link (path)
(interactive "sfoo path: ")
(insert (format "[[foo:%s][%s]]" path path)))
Daniele Nicolodi writes:
> On 10/13/16 8:14 AM, John Kitchin wrote:
>> In org8, this is not that easy to do, but not imposs
Hello,
Michael Brand writes:
> Or maybe add new value(s) to org-descriptive-links to avoid yet
> another defcustom and first of all to have it in that one variable
> that when set to nil turns off any mechanism that hides anything in
> links already?
I'm fine with that, too.
Regards,
--
Nico
Hello,
Daniele Nicolodi writes:
> However I think that what you are proposing is a change in behavior
> that does not strictly solve a technical problem.
This is a change in display. I don't think it affects very much, if at
all, any "behavior", except that editing link is much more predictable
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 12:13 PM Rasmus wrote:
>
> Aside: with Gitlab.com Pages, and Gitlab in general, you can specify your
> own build process and you would thus not need to wait for Github to add
> this particular feature.
>
+1 for Gitlab Pages.
I have started using Hugo few days back. All I d
Hi list!
Made a few lines of elisp that take one org-file and turns it into a static
website.
https://github.com/phfrohring/org-to-blog
Since it is useful to me, I tried to share it. Someone tried, but some bug
occurred:
https://github.com/phfrohring/org-to-blog/issues/1
I cannot reprodu
On 13 October 2016, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
As such, I believe, having the [ ] markers should be an option, and probably
not enabled by default.
After seeing further conversation I've changed my mind, and don't like the idea
of [ ] markers around links, so FWIW I agree with Daniele.
Bill
--
On 2016-10-13 21:6, Pierre-Henry Frohring
wrote:
>
> Hi list!
> Made a few lines of elisp that take one org-file and turns it into a static
> website.
> https://github.com/phfrohring/org-to-blog
>
> Since it is useful to me, I tried to share it. Someone tried, but some bug
> occurre
Hi Nicolas,
2016ko urriak 13an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hello,
>
> Aaron Ecay writes:
>
>> FWIW, I agree. On the other hand, many people object to the brackets.
>
> I don't mind adding a variable.
I think that org in general has too many customization variables. Of
course, for
@Nick:
Thanks for the explanation, it's very kind of you!
@John:
You are right, this actually works. However, this will also exclude the
trees
whose property value is empty, for example, the following tree will be
excluded,
which will not be excluded if "myproperty<>nil" syntax works:
* Tree
:P
46 matches
Mail list logo
