Re: [O] Babel support for Processing-language

Jarmo Hurri writes: > Yep, I am going to start doing this if no-one is working on it yet. > > I woke up in the middle of the night to realize how amazingly easily > this can be done if I drop out the support for PDF export, that is, > only leave the option to export as HTML. There is no need to

Re: [O] Include another org-document without settings

Hello, Stefan Nobis writes: > Maybe it would be a helful extension to give #+INCLUDE an option to > just ignore global settings? You can skip the first lines of an INCLUDEd file with :line parameter. You can also only include a section. See manual for details. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] org-expiry not compatible with the new drawer syntax

Samuel Loury writes: > Please find attached the merged patch, as asked for. Applied, thank you. > Therefore, the hooks associated to the insertion of a heading will be > triggered. Since those hooks may cause the creation of some > metadata. `org-end-of-meta-data' is used afterward. Note that

Re: [O] http://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/ broken

Hello! >> Svjatoslav Agejenko writes: >> >> > Button "Show Org source" on page >> > http://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/ >> > does not work. >> >> You could try the explicit >> http://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/index.html instead. The >> button's action depends on the concrete for

Re: [O] org-expiry not compatible with the new drawer syntax

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Samuel Loury writes: > >> Please find attached the merged patch, as asked for. > > Applied, thank you. > >> Therefore, the hooks associated to the insertion of a heading will be >> triggered. Since those hooks may cause the creation of some >> metadata. `org-end-of-meta

Re: [O] save folded state

Worth trying the buffer-invisibility-spec solution. I'd be interested to know if it works or not. Although I wonder whether the commands that you are using really should be obeying visibility context. Phil John Kitchin writes: > yes, I meant programatically. I was having some issue in selecting

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Richard Lawrence writes: > 2) There are at least several different backend reference database > formats (BibTeX, Zotero, etc.) used by Orgsters. Not all such databases > use human-readable keys. Org also has a nice internal format for > storing reference information: org-bibtex. Human readable

Re: [O] Include another org-document without settings

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > You can skip the first lines of an INCLUDEd file with :line parameter. > You can also only include a section. See manual for details. Thank you for the hint. I used something like #+INCLUDE "a.org" :lines 3- but still got duplicate keywords (the KEYWORDS option is

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Thomas S. Dye writes: > Aloha Richard, > > Richard Lawrence writes: > >> My point is not that the link syntax *can't* do enough. Rather, my >> point is that citations are conceptually distinct from links, and if we >> are going to adopt an official syntax for them, that syntax should >> reflect

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Richard Lawrence writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Richard Lawrence writes: >> >>> ...so the first step for introducing citation syntax to Org should be >>> compiling a list of all the things such a syntax should represent. >> >> See also >> >>

Re: [O] Citations, continued

John Kitchin writes: > See cite:Doe1999 for an overview; a more extensive discussion is in > cite:Foobar2000 This is ok and supported by ox-bibtex.el. > if the pre/post text is really critical somehow, you can do this. > > [[cite:Doe1999][See::for an overview]]; a more extensive discussion is i

Re: [O] Citations, continued

t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > You and others are advocating a separate syntax for links and citations, > which might indeed be the way to go. I can see it being much nicer than > the current state of affairs with Org mode links. The downside is that > it will mean learning another set

[O] org-agenda-other-frame

I have a key which calls `gnus-other-frame`, a handy function that not only pops up a gnus frame, but also kills the frame when I exit gnus. I'd like something similar with my org agenda; the following function is used to pop it up, but I'm not sure how to kill the frame when I hit close the age

Re: [O] Citations, continued

I have very little of substance to say, but many thanks to Richard for raising the level of discourse to a much more sophisticated one than I was able to achieve in my initial post. I don't feel qualified to comment on whether links or a new citation syntax is appropriate. But I do think that Ric

Re: [O] Citations, continued

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 at 10:26:05 PST, Richard Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > […] > > As I mentioned in the earlier thread, I think the Pandoc syntax is a > good place to start, and I think it would be valuable to have the two > syntaxes be compatible. But even Pandoc's citation syntax might not

Re: [O] org-agenda-other-frame

torys.ander...@gmail.com (Tory S. Anderson) wrote: > I have a key which calls `gnus-other-frame`, a handy function that not > only pops up a gnus frame, but also kills the frame when I exit > gnus. I'd like something similar with my org agenda; the following > function is used to pop it up, but I'm

Re: [O] Citations, continued

t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > You and others are advocating a separate syntax for links and citations, > which might indeed be the way to go. I can see it being much nicer than > the current state of affairs with Org mode links. The downside is that > it will mean learning another set

Re: [O] Bug: org-agenda-diary-entry messes with datetree in org-agenda-diary-file [8.3beta (release_8.3beta-785-gb5d9f4 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)]

Hello, Gregor Zattler writes: > Dear org-mode developers, > > adding a date to the datetree in the org-agenda-diary-file > produces a mess: > > - emacs-snapshot -Q -L /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/ -nw –eval (setq > org-agenda-diary-file "/tmp/diary.org") > - Mx org-agenda > - a > - i > - d > -

Re: [O] Bug: 8.2.10 fails to insert diary entry [as opposed to 8.3beta (release_8.3beta-785-gb5d9f4 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)]

Hello, Gregor Zattler writes: > Dear org-mode developers, > > from the agenda I want to add an entry to the diary. When I do > > emacs24 -Q -nw > M-x org-mode > M-x org-agenda > a > i > d > > I get: > > Diary entry: [d]ay [w]eekly [m]onthly [y]early [a]nniversary [b]lock [c]yclic > org-agenda-d

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi Rasmus and all, Rasmus writes: > Richard Lawrence writes: >> Within a citation, each reference to an individual work needs to be >> capable of containing: >> 1) a database key that references the cited work >> 2) prefix / pre-text >> 3) suffix / post-text >> 4) references to page/ch

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi all, Here is the citation syntax proposal I have mentioned in a couple of posts now. I have attached it as an Org document for better readability, and also reproduced the text below. Let me know what you think! Best, Richard #+TITLE: A Proposal for Org citation syntax #+AUTHOR: Richard Law

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi, Richard Lawrence writes: > Hi Rasmus and all, > > Rasmus writes: > >> Richard Lawrence writes: > >>> Within a citation, each reference to an individual work needs to be >>> capable of containing: >>> 1) a database key that references the cited work >>> 2) prefix / pre-text >>> 3) suf

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi John, John Kitchin writes: >> Now, I agree with you that Org mode links are not ideal for citations. >> Parsing the description is humbug and error-prone, and the descriptions >> look ungainly in the Org mode document. I never remember to click >> citation links in the "right" place! There

Re: [O] Citations, continued

You can color your own links like this: (highlight-regexp "cite:\\([a-zA-Z0-9]*[-_:]*\\)*" 'dired-warning) (highlight-regexp "citenum:\\([a-zA-Z0-9]*[-_:]*\\)*" 'dired-marked) The regexps are not as robust as what org uses, the plain link on my system looks like: "\\<\\(Autocite[*s]?\\|Cite\

Re: [O] Citations, continued

> I'm glad you like Samuel's idea about extensible syntax for links. I > don't know if it is practical or not, but it was one of those ideas that > seemed right on when I first read it. I am glad you mentioned, it was an inspiration! Although this is sure to move away from a standard new syntax,

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi, Richard Lawrence writes: > Here is the citation syntax proposal I have mentioned in a couple of > posts now. Thanks. I think it's a good start, but I find it too far away from Org in some respects. Hence comments follow. > ** Backend-agnostic formatting properties > *** Selecting specifi

[O] Bug: agenda interaction with org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks, org-agenda-max-entries and org-enforce-todo-dependencies [8.3beta (release_8.3beta-785-gb5d9f4 @ /Users/yn/dotfiles/org.emacs.d/org-mode/

Consider the following org file: * Tasks ** Ordered Tasks :PROPERTIES: :ORDERED: t :END: *** TODO Module 1 TODO Item 1 SCHEDULED: <2015-02-01 Sun> TODO Item 2 SCHEDULED: <2015-02-01 Sun> *** TODO Module 2 TODO Item 3 SCHEDULED: <2015-02-01 Sun> TODO Item 4 SCHEDULED: <2015-02-0

Re: [O] Citations, continued

John Kitchin writes: > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results silent > (org-add-link-type > "slink" ...) > #+END_SRC Thanks John, this is great! I managed to chop down my citation setup to the following: [[cite:key :pre pre :post post :type type]] with reasonable support for other backends. I only

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi John, Wow. It's inspiring to see Samuel's idea in action. Presumably, something like this would also be possible? ;; follow function (lambda (path) (let* ((data (read (concat "(" path ")"))) (head (car data)) (plist (cadr data))) (funcall (plist-get plist :follow) he

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Thanks! I had been thinking about how to do that for a while, and seeing Samuel's idea crytallized it for me. Thanks Samuel, and Tom for remembering it from long ago. yes that should also be possible. once you open the rabbit hole of embedded lisp, many things are possible ;) even beyond citations

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi Rasmus and all, Thanks for your comments! Rasmus writes: >> ** Backend-agnostic formatting properties >> *** Selecting specific fields >> Selecting specific fields to display could be done by appending field >> names to cite keys after colons, much like Org tags: >> #+BEGIN_QUOTE >> [See @Do

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Org-ref is very functional and has so far been able to deal with much of my needs. So, I just hope we are not trying to fix something that is not broken. The real need in the context of citations is to somehow extend the bibtex/biblatex integration to other export formats (odt/html, most impor

Re: [O] Citations, continued

On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 at 10:02:41 PST, Richard Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here is the citation syntax proposal I have mentioned in a couple of > posts now. I have attached it as an Org document for better > readability, and also reproduced the text below. Let me know what you > think! Hi R

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi Erik and all, Erik Hetzner writes: > I am really, really glad to see people discussing citations in > org-mode. But I have some concerns about this proposal. > > Before extensions are proposed to the pandoc format, I think it is > important to understand how flexible the combination of pandoc

[O] How does one search the archives for bug reports?

Greetings, Entering "bug" results in "References: [ bug: 0 ] No document matching your query.". Entering "+subject:bug" results in "References: [ (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] No document matching your query." So, I'm at a loss on how I can tell if someone has already reported my issue

[O] Bug: ELPA org-plus-contrib package is missing files from the contrib/lisp directory

In particular (comparing the org-plus-contrib-20150202 package against today's http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/contrib/lisp): htmlize.el ob-stata.el org-colview-xemacs.el (not that I really care about this one) org-download.el org-ebib.el org-effectiveness.el org-eldoc.e

[O] orgmode as a transcription tool?

Today I was looking for a tool to ease my transcription of a recording of a half-hour appointment with a doctor. Googling led to https://transcribe.wreally.com/ for the job - it really works well, and it seems like something orgmode should be able to do. The idea is to unite a media player with a

Re: [O] orgmode as a transcription tool?

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:23:25PM -0600, Bill White wrote: > Today I was looking for a tool to ease my transcription of a recording > of a half-hour appointment with a doctor. > > Googling led to https://transcribe.wreally.com/ for the job - it really > works well, and it seems like something orgm

Re: [O] orgmode as a transcription tool?

Hello, You should have a look at EMMS. It's suite easy to setup on linux. But if you are using a MS Windows OS, it does requiert more settings. But everything you light ne controlable within Emacs. Regards, Basile Le 3 févr. 2015 06:27, "Russell Adams" a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:23

Re: [O] Citations, continued

Hi Richard, On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 at 20:41:06 PST, Richard Lawrence wrote: > > Hi Erik and all, > > Actually, I totally agree. For my own use, I would be completely happy > with just using the Pandoc syntax for citations in Org, without any > modifications. Great! > The only reason I proposed