According to http://orgmode.org/manual/Drawers.html, drawer items should
only show when cursor is on the drawer and tab is pressed. But my drawer
items shows up when I do tab cycling.
I have * Tasks ** buy book *** Book note :book note:
:END:
When I press tab on * Tasks, drawer items show up.
T
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Krenn writes:
> I create a new file test.gpg and write
>
> # -*- mode:org; epa-file-encrypt-to: ("b...@blub.com") -*-
>
> (b...@blub.com replaced by my mail address) as the first line. Then I
> save this file and I'm asked
>
> Select recipents for encryption.
> If no one
Hi Paul,
Paul Stansell writes:
> For example, for the org file below, editing the line "level 2" when
> both "Section 1" and "Section 2" are folded (hidden) causes only
> "Section 1" to be unfolded with "Section 2" still folded inside it.
> Thus, the edits are not visible.
>
> * section 1
> l
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
>
> > Trouble is you guys are the hares that make us (me at least) into
> > tortoises --
> > you add significant functionality faster than I can keep with the
> > 'what' (leave aside how and details).
>
> Well, remember that W
Hello,
Chris Henderson writes:
> According to http://orgmode.org/manual/Drawers.html, drawer items should
> only show when cursor is on the drawer and tab is pressed. But my drawer
> items shows up when I do tab cycling.
>
> I have * Tasks ** buy book *** Book note :book note:
> :END:
>
> When
Bastien writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> This was slightly mis-aligned in the source file, leading me to believe
>> it's just a nesting error. As it is, any template which *isn't using*
>> the not-in-file predicate is going to flag as acceptable for the current
>> context. I t
Sorry but not sure what you mean. I don't seem to have any space character
in the drawer's name. I inserted the drawer using M-x org-insert-drawer.
Thanks for further clarification.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Chris Henderson writes:
>
> > According to
Chris Henderson writes:
> Sorry but not sure what you mean. I don't seem to have any space character
> in the drawer's name. I inserted the drawer using M-x org-insert-drawer.
>
> Thanks for further clarification.
You are using:
:book note: <-- no space here.
:END:
Oddly, `o
Hi Rustom,
Rustom Mody writes:
> Would such a doc be appropriate for worg?
this looks like a nice blog entry, but that's also fine on Worg: there
is a users directory where people are welcome to put writings of their
own like this one.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Noah Slater writes:
> Can the dots use a custom face? I'd like to customise the colour (by
> perhaps turning it off).
It uses the shadow face.
M-x customize-face RET shadow RET
--
Bastien
Hmm. Okay. It might be a good idea to have org-clock-shadow or something,
so it can be customised separately. I might want to hide the dots, but
still have shadow as a useable face.
On 20 April 2014 11:02, Bastien wrote:
> Noah Slater writes:
>
> > Can the dots use a custom face? I'd like to c
Can the dots use a custom face? I'd like to customise the colour (by
perhaps turning it off).
On 19 April 2014 07:18, Bastien wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sebastien Vauban
> writes:
>
> > See http://screencast.com/t/fmR5TJfa what happens to the size of the
> > titles, when the overlay is applied or re
Okay, yep. I'm happy with the org-clock-display stuff for now. Thanks for
your responses on this thread.
On 17 April 2014 12:34, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> Noah Slater writes:
>
> > "[01:10]" would mean I had spent 1hr 10m on this node, and all
> > subnodes. Similarly, "[2d 01:10]" would me
Noah Slater writes:
> Hmm. Okay. It might be a good idea to have org-clock-shadow or
> something, so it can be customised separately. I might want to hide
> the dots, but still have shadow as a useable face.
Let me resist to this for a while: I'm not fan a having a separate
face for everything
At the start of a clocktable, I can specify a few parameters that allow me
to filter/restrict the time ranges used for display.
For instance, this only shows me clocks from the past 30 days:
:tstart "<-30d>"
What I'd like to do is do this for org-clock-display too.
Perhaps I could specify it at
Hi Batien,
Thank you for extending this!
I have attached the patch for translating the section heading into German.
Best wishes
Julian
On 17.04.2014 17:26, Bastien wrote:
Hi Julian,
Julian Gehring writes:
Would it be reasonable to have an additional option for customizing the
HTML headin
Thanks for the help, folks!
On 17 April 2014 10:38, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> Noah Slater writes:
>
> > My intention here is to highlight notes that have received no
> > attention. I want them to show up on my report so that I can see that
> > I need to work on them.*
>
> You can create a
Hi Julian,
Julian Gehring writes:
> I have attached the patch for translating the section heading into
> German.
Applied, thanks!
--
Bastien
Hmm. I'm not sure this is working.
If you add ":link" to the BEGIN blog, the sorting doesn't appear to kick
in. Bug, I expect.
If I remove ":link" I can see that some sorting is taking place. But it's
not what I expect.
With "?t" I am getting this sort order:
- (empty cell)
- "4:02"
- "1d 5:15"
Thanks Sacha, that's great!
On 18 April 2014 02:09, Sacha Chua wrote:
> Noah Slater writes:
>
> Hello, Noah, all!
>
> > Using this a bit, it doesn't quite do what I want it to do.
> > Is there any way to sort recursively?
> > At the moment, calling org-sort-entries on the whole buffer only sor
Noah Slater writes:
> If you add ":link" to the BEGIN blog, the sorting doesn't appear to
> kick in. Bug, I expect.
Please provide a reproducible example.
--
Bastien
Noah Slater writes:
> What do others think about this idea?
I welcome feedback on this but let's take care not to overengineer
this: if we add to many features to `org-clock-display', it will blur
the line between this temporary display and clock tables.
I would first try using temporary clock
Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> Noah Slater writes:
>
>> Hmm. Okay. It might be a good idea to have org-clock-shadow or
>> something, so it can be customised separately. I might want to hide
>> the dots, but still have shadow as a useable face.
>
> Let me resist to this for a while: I'm not fan a ha
I suppose, in a way, blurring the line between org-clock-display and
clocktables is what I am trying to do. I think org-clock-display is much
more useful and easier to use. (Though I don't doubt that clocktables work
better for some folks.)
I started out with clocktables, but I found it clumsy to
Aggghhh.
I changed to the Enlightenment desktop manager, changed my underlying distro to
Lubuntu (LXDE)
Both desktop managers co-opt the C-M-right and -left keys to change desktops.
(They also co-opt C-S-right.) Ditto -up and -down.
I have tried the following:
(global-set-key (kbd "C-S-right"
Susan Cragin writes:
> Aggghhh.
> I changed to the Enlightenment desktop manager, changed my underlying
> distro to Lubuntu (LXDE)
>
> Both desktop managers co-opt the C-M-right and -left keys to change
> desktops. (They also co-opt C-S-right.) Ditto -up and -down.
>
> I have tried the following:
I answered my own question.
.emacs does not take precedence over my desktop manager.
Solution: use Super key, as follows.
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-demote-subtree)
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-promote-subtree)
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-move-subtree-up)
(global-set-key (kbd "
Thanks, Thorsten, for the <> hint.
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-demote-subtree)
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-promote-subtree)
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-move-subtree-up)
(global-set-key (kbd "C-s-") 'org-move-subtree-down)
-Original Message-
>From: Thorsten Jolitz
>Se
Hi Sébastien,
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> If you don't like to add a face, then I'd also favor the possibility to
> turn off the display of dots -- without having to touch the shadow face.
Well, I don't want to add a face for the same reasons I don't want
adding an option: we are really in the
I guess Sebastien's point is that without a custom face, the only way to
turn the dots off is to set the shadow face to be hidden. But that could
have unintended side-effects. So if there's no custom face, then there
should be a config so that people can turn it off without having to deal
with thos
Hi Noah,
Noah Slater writes:
> I guess Sebastien's point is that without a custom face, the only way to
> turn the dots off is to set the shadow face to be hidden. But that could
> have unintended side-effects. So if there's no custom face, then there
> should be a config so that people can tu
Noah Slater writes:
> Note: sorting the clock table doesn't work very well. I want each
> level to be sorted recursively.
Yeah, me too -- if you can work on enhancing how the :sort parameters
is handled for clocktables, that'd be great.
As for the rest, please try C-u C-u C-c C-x C-d from maste
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Christoph Groth
wrote:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well.
>
> Thank you, John, for your detailed reply.
>
> > we routinely do this, in the following way. We run jobs that may take
> > up t
You are describing what I see as a need to run processes asynchronously.
We use the Torque queue system for this. It takes care of scheduling and
running jobs on a cluster.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Christoph Groth
wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> > Generally, org-babel is suited for long running
Thanks!
On 20 April 2014 07:31, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Leonard,
>
> (you forgot to copy the list I think.)
>
> I finally committed your solution, convinced by your tests.
>
> Now we reached the limit for the changes, let's wait until the
> FSF confirms you can contribute more code.
>
> Thanks agai
Hello Sacha,
Sacha Chua wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
I would like to automatically count the number of children under a
given heading. For example, I would like to have
* Cars (2)
** BMW
** Escort
>>>
>>> There is no such feature in Org, but I seem to remember someo
Hi Bastien,
On 2014-04-17, Bastien wrote:
> The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
> or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
>
> Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to
> implement. But maybe other users have existing use-case
Hi Bastien,
I apologize that I missed your reply, I discovered it until now when I was
checking the replies in the "Sent" folder.
> The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
> or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
To me, raw link is hardly useful beca
Hi Bastian,
I apologize for missing your reply until I check in the folder "Sent".
I'm sorry that my bug report might not be clear enough. What I meant was that
with one prefix argument, the command `org-insert-heading' should insert a new
heading *before* the current heading, not after. In this
Hi Bastien,
Upgraded org-mode - problem gone!
Thank you!
Torben
On 19 April 2014 07:28, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Torben,
>
> torben.leh...@gmail.com writes:
>
> > Package: Org-mode version 7.9.3f
>
> I can reproduce the bug with this version, but it has been fixed in
> the meantime and Org version
Org-mode version 8.2.5h (8.2.5h-106-gfaa170-elpa @
c:/Users/user-name/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140414/)
TLDR version: Should `?T' not appear twice?
/
(defun org-sparse-tree (&optional arg type)
...
(cond
...
((equal ans ?T)
(org-show-todo-tree '(4)))
((member ans
Hi there,
While adding support for org-mode in easy-kill¹ I have discovered C-M-a
and C-M-e work asymmetrically. C-M-e moves forward 2 headlines while
C-M-a move back 1.
Cheers,
Leo
Footnotes:
¹ https://github.com/leoliu/easy-kill
goal: to make better use of agenda-views and sparse-trees
strategy: to better understand what customization would be possible,
should I need to consider them at some point (or even to be able to
think about what commands they each are based on)
difficulty: planning out exactly how I'll use t
Xebar Saram writes:
> Hi guys
>
> a related newbie question that occurred to me from reading this thread
> (sorry for "crashing" the thread :)). if i understand correctly from the
> above posts, is there a way to batch evaluate multiple org mode code blocks
> at once?
> My use case is using babel
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
Hello, Seb, all!
> Yes, I almost remembered what you wrote in
> http://sachachua.com/blog/2008/01/outlining-your-notes-with-org/,
> section "Getting a Sense of Progress". Still, it is about counting
> headlines, but with a special cookie you add.
Wow, I totally forgot a
45 matches
Mail list logo
