Hi Bastien,
Org-mode version 8.2.5h (release_8.2.5h-883-g45e881 @
/Users/gtk/.emacs.d/org/lisp/)
Sure, I'm happy to go with the FSF copyright agreement. I'll send the
request today.
Greg
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes:
>
>> This is
Hi Alan,
thanks for sharing -- some comments:
- you need to update the copyright of the file;
- example code in section 3 of the header is mangled;
- there are some dangling parentheses;
- use (get-text-property (point-min) ...) instead of
(get-text-property 1 ...)
- I'd use org-review inst
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> As you may know, `org-element-context' returns the object under point,
> according to Org Syntax. The questions are: should it be a little
> sloppy, for convenience? And, if it should, what degree of sloppiness is
> acceptable?
I don't think `org-element-co
Hi Greg,
Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes:
> Org-mode version 8.2.5h (release_8.2.5h-883-g45e881 @
> /Users/gtk/.emacs.d/org/lisp/)
Thanks,
> Sure, I'm happy to go with the FSF copyright agreement. I'll send the
> request today.
Re-thanks!
PS: the fix won't make it for 8.2.6 but the issue is a ra
Bastien writes:
> I don't think `org-element-context' should be sloppy *at all*.
>
> Hope this all makes sense -- let me know what you think.
It makes sense to me, and I agree with you : org element should not
parse the syntax differently just because e.g. we put a link in a
comment and want to o
Nicolas Richard writes:
> For comparison, AucTeX has a variable LaTeX-syntactic-comments which
> controls that kind of thing : "If non-nil comments will be handled
> according to LaTeX syntax."
That's interesting indeed, thanks for sharing.
--
Bastien
Hi Carsten,
now that I'm down the pile of email I was late on, let me say I'm
glad to be "officially" back -- it was a great relief to be able to
not be in charge for a year, it helped me to step back and do a lot
of other things.
So thanks for the switch one year earlier, and for this one!
Let'
Bastien writes:
Hi Bastien,
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> The real value and innovation of a true
>> org-minor-mode would be to introduce Org's intelligent headlines and all
>> the related functionality into the world of outcommented text in
>> programming modes.
>
> Yes. We could have `orgst
Samuel Wales writes:
Hi Samuel,
> another option is to create annotation mechanisms that are so
> compelling that you don't need org in non-org files.
>
> your lists and tasks would stay in your org agenda files, but your
> external files would be able to show (via overlays) and link to the
> a
Hi Bastien,
Thanks a lot for these, I'll look into them. I have a couple questions
in the meantime.
On 2014-04-19 10:14, Bastien writes:
> - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam.
> instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda
> will not create false positiv
Alan Schmitt writes:
>> - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam.
>> instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda
>> will not create false positives by inserting entries with
>> a REVIEW property.
>
> OK. I'm not sure what "[" is supposed to do in the agenda,
Hello,
please consider attached example Org document 'ex.org'. There seems to
be a problem when tangling a source block with noweb reference, without
it source block is tangled fine.
Two examples are also attached.
Emacs version: 24.4.50 (trunk rev. 116991);
org-mode: Org-mode version 8.2.5h (re
Hi Konstantin,
Konstantin Kliakhandler writes:
> I've discovered a bug that hinders typing when org-indent-mode and
> linum-mode are both enabled.
Yes, I see this glitch too, and I confirm disabling linum-mode
when org-indent-mode is the thing to do... unless someone gets
really annoyed by this
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Lomov writes:
> please consider attached example Org document 'ex.org'. There seems to
> be a problem when tangling a source block with noweb reference, without
> it source block is tangled fine.
yes, a bug I introduced myself, fixed now.
Thanks for reporting this,
--
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> In summary, its about:
>
> 1. generalize the regexp constants and vars (allow for comment-syntax,
> when org-minor-mode)
>
> 2. deal with hardcoded regexp-snippets in functions (my proposoal:
> replace "^" with org-BOL, "$" with org-EOL, "\\*" with org-
Hi Nick,
Thanks for guiding me to a solution, which was to write write my own
defcustom `my-org-format-latex-header`, changing the first line from
the definition in org.el to "\\documentclass[fleqn]{article}". This
definition I call `my-org-format-latex-header`. I then redefine
`org-create-formula
Hi Bastien,
Thanks for applying this and for being so diligent in keeping org great. I
have requested the fsf agreement and will sign it when it comes. One
additional minor issue I noticed is that in the docstring for the function
`org-bibtex', it reads, `org-bibtex-export-headline' where it should
** Bastien [2014-04-19 14:56:19 +0200]:
> Hi Vladimir,
> Vladimir Lomov writes:
>> please consider attached example Org document 'ex.org'. There seems to
>> be a problem when tangling a source block with noweb reference, without
>> it source block is tangled fine.
> yes, a bug I introduced mys
Hi Bastien et. al,
I figured out how to fix the bug i reported awhile ago. The problem was
that when making the keyword field for entries without keywords defined in
the `:PROPERTIES:' drawer, org-bibtex uses `bibtex-make-field' from
`bibtex.el'. This function sends up an error if there are no fie
Maybe a spoke too soon. My answer below is partly the case. When I
turn on latexpreview with `#+STARTUP: latexpreview` then my formula is
laid out the way I intend, i.e.:
http://imgur.com/eMrwiIJ
Strangely, however, when I hit C-c C-c to remove the preview, then run
`org-preview-latex-fragment` by
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> zwz writes:
>
>> Can you give me some example code?
>
> I was thinking about something like this (untested):
>
> (let (template)
> (defun ngz-set-template (new)
> (setq template new))
> (defun ngz-latex-process (file)
> (case template
> (a (do-somethin
Hi Leonard,
Leonard Randall writes:
> Thanks for applying this and for being so diligent in keeping org
> great. I have requested the fsf agreement and will sign it when it
> comes. One additional minor issue I noticed is that in the docstring
> for the function `org-bibtex', it reads, `org-bibt
Hi Leonard,
Leonard Randall writes:
> I figured out how to fix the bug i reported awhile ago. The problem
> was that when making the keyword field for entries without keywords
> defined in the `:PROPERTIES:' drawer, org-bibtex uses
> `bibtex-make-field' from `bibtex.el'. This function sends up
+1
Apr 19, 2014 6:33 PM、Bastien のメール：
> Hi Carsten,
>
> now that I'm down the pile of email I was late on, let me say I'm
> glad to be "officially" back -- it was a great relief to be able to
> not be in charge for a year, it helped me to step back and do a lot
> of other things.
>
> So thanks
Pete Ley gmail.com> writes:
>
> I've looked at the solution on worg and, though I didn't actually try to
> implement, it seems like tangling your init file every time you open
> Emacs is a little cumbersome. Please correct me if I'm wrong in this
> assumption.
OK, here goes:
In `org-babel-lo
Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> I fixed this by ignoring the error, since the field is inserted
> anyway.
For some reason ignoring errors doesn't work for me. The new function,
doesn't add a keywords field to non-standard bib entry types, it just puts
the tags before the beginning of the bibtex en
Hi Leonard,
Leonard Randall writes:
> For some reason ignoring errors doesn't work for me. The new
> function, doesn't add a keywords field to non-standard bib entry
> types, it just puts the tags before the beginning of the bibtex
> entry, which would mess up the resulting bibtex file.
Can you
thank you both!
(add-hook 'org-finalize-agenda-hook
(lambda ()
(set (make-local-variable 'tooltip-delay) 86400)
;; disable the face that comes up when mouse pointer
;; is over an org agenda line. that can be confusing
;; because i already
I wrote some code that does some of this here:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2014/03/05/Creating-a-transportable-zip-archive-of-an-org-file/
It doesn't do anything fancy like you describe, but it does get images and
files into the zip file.
John
---
John
Thank you, John, for your detailed reply.
> we routinely do this, in the following way. We run jobs that may take
> up to a week to finish, and they are usually run on a cluster. Our
> setup relies on the following behavior for a script.
>
> 1. you can run the script anytime you want, and it can t
Thanks!
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Konstantin Kliakhandler writes:
>
> > I've discovered a bug that hinders typing when org-indent-mode and
> > linum-mode are both enabled.
>
> Yes, I see this glitch too, and I confirm disabling linum-mode
> when org-i
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> #+name: z
> : "bar"
> #+name: test3
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var x="foo"
> x
> #+end_src
>
> #+name:test4
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var y=test1(x=z)
> y
> #+end_src
>
> #+results: test4
> : "bar"
>
> #+call: test4(z="BAZ")
Bastien writes:
> Brady Trainor writes:
>
>> Have you migrated your init files into .org file(s)? What's your
>> setup?
>
> I do, and find it very convenient.
>
> My setup is here: http://bzg.fr/emacs.html
My setup is available here.
https://github.com/eschulte/emacs24-starter-kit
It is desig
Hi guys
a related newbie question that occurred to me from reading this thread
(sorry for "crashing" the thread :)). if i understand correctly from the
above posts, is there a way to batch evaluate multiple org mode code blocks
at once?
My use case is using babel with R statistics where i have mul
I've got this for three capture templates that should only work in Gnus:
(setq org-capture-templates-contexts
'(("M" ((in-mode . "gnus-\\(summary\\|article\\)")))
("P" ((in-mode . "gnus-\\(summary\\|article\\)")))
("H" ((in-mode . "gnus-\\(summary\\|article\\)")
This wor
Hi Markus,
Markus Hauck writes:
> It seems like org-refile with the goto argument is no longer allowed
> From non org-mode buffers.
I reverted your patch.
> In commit 49da67d the condition was changed from:
>
> (unless goto ...)
>
> to:
>
> (unless (and goto (listp goto)) ...)
>
> where the co
Brady Trainor writes:
> Was there a better way (outside of joining development of
> calfw-org)?
PS: Joining forces for development always seems like a good idea :)
--
Bastien
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> This was slightly mis-aligned in the source file, leading me to believe
> it's just a nesting error. As it is, any template which *isn't using*
> the not-in-file predicate is going to flag as acceptable for the current
> context. I think it should just be:
>
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
