On 18.12.2012, at 18:56, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>> Well this is very safe - but if you have to assume that every elisp
>> command does change match data behind your back, you would have to
>> create a lot of extra code.
>
> Stefan Monnier advises the opposite (quote from
>
Hello,
Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously
does not work.
If one could specify a list of tags from which to complete, it would be
great as well.
Thanks a lot,
Alan
Alan Schmitt writes:
> I'll commit as soon as I can find the magic git incantations to get rid
> of the "merge" commits that happened as I was pulling changes from the
> repository.
Just cherry-pick your changes on top of the new master or use the
rewrite facility in magit. If you want to avoid t
Hi Alan,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>> I'll commit as soon as I can find the magic git incantations to get rid
>> of the "merge" commits that happened as I was pulling changes from the
>> repository.
>
> Just cherry-pick your changes on top of the new master or use the
> rewrite
Hi Alan,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously
> does not work.
C-c C-q
HTH,
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>
>> Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously
>> does not work.
>
> C-c C-q
Thanks a lot!
Is there a way to set-up the capture buffer so that tags may be
completed according to the ones present in another file?
Hi Samuel and Nicolas,
I allowed myself to fix this, with a somewhat smaller patch:
http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?h=maint&id=14ffe2
Thanks Samuel for the patch and for reporting this problem!
--
Bastien
On 20.12.2012, at 09:30, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> Alan Schmitt writes:
>>
>>> Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously
>>> does not work.
>>
>> C-c C-q
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Is there a way to set-up the capture buffer so that
Achim Gratz writes:
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>> I'll commit as soon as I can find the magic git incantations to get rid
>> of the "merge" commits that happened as I was pulling changes from the
>> repository.
>
> Just cherry-pick your changes on top of the new master or use the
> rewrite facility in
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On 20.12.2012, at 09:30, Alan Schmitt wrote:
>> Is there a way to set-up the capture buffer so that tags may be
>> completed according to the ones present in another file?
>
> You will be able to complete based on what is present in the target
> file, is that not good en
Bastien writes:
>> | In org-get-location:
>> | org.el:6989:10:Warning: `special-display-function' is an obsolete variable
>> (as
>> | of 24.3); use `display-buffer-alist' instead.
>> | org.el:6988:10:Warning: `special-display-regexps' is an obsolete variable
>> (as
>> | of 24.3); use `dis
Myles,
Thank you for this answer.
I tried it with
---
(add-to-list 'org-export-preprocess-hook
'my-export-delete-headlines-tagged-noheading)
---
But I got some errors when exporting
---
I'm documenting a crontab file, and I have an interesting folding bug.
Here is what is in my file:
*** crontab -l
#+BEGIN_SRC crontab
* * * * * do something
0 16 * * * do something else
0 10 * * * do another thing
#+END_SRC
The problem is that the initial '*' in the crontab confuses org mode. Is
Hi Alan,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> So is there a way to tell capture to search for the tags in todo.org
> instead of refile.org (which does not contain any)?
If refile.org does not contain any tags, the simple fix is to add the
tags in todo.org to refile.org. Or am I missing something?
--
Bast
Since (point-marker) is shorter and a bit faster than
(move-marker (make-marker) (point)), why not use it?
Dmitry
commit 1988bf0f4a5e486030e6c03b6ec172ede609d491
Author: Dmitry Antipov
Date: Thu Dec 20 08:46:41 2012 +0400
Use (point-marker) instead of (move-marker (make-marker) (point))
Achim Gratz writes:
> Something like this maybe?
Yes, exactly. Thanks for this patch.
Can you just rename `org-suppress-popups' to `org-no-popups' and
add a docstring to the macro? Then feel free to commit and push.
--
Bastien
Dmitry Antipov writes:
> Since (point-marker) is shorter and a bit faster than
> (move-marker (make-marker) (point)), why not use it?
Indeed. I cannot apply the patch, git am returns "patch format
detection faild." Can you resubmit it using git format-patch?
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>
>> So is there a way to tell capture to search for the tags in todo.org
>> instead of refile.org (which does not contain any)?
>
> If refile.org does not contain any tags, the simple fix is to add the
> tags in todo.org to refile.org. Or am I
Bastien writes:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>
>> The problem is that the initial '*' in the crontab confuses org mode. Is
>> there a way around it, or is it a bug?
>
> You need to TAB once in such block so that the ambiguous characters like
> "* " are comma-escaped.
I see. Tabing folds t
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I cannot reproduce this with the new exporter.
Me neither.. I must have been using the wrong exporter.
Thanks for double-checking, and glad there is no bug here
for the new exporter!
--
Bastien
Hi Alan,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> The problem is that the initial '*' in the crontab confuses org mode. Is
> there a way around it, or is it a bug?
You need to TAB once in such block so that the ambiguous characters like
"* " are comma-escaped.
--
Bastien
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> On 20.12.2012, at 09:30, Alan Schmitt wrote:
>>> Is there a way to set-up the capture buffer so that tags may be
>>> completed according to the ones present in another file?
>>
>> You will be able to complete based on what is present in the tar
Bastien writes:
> Indeed. I cannot apply the patch, git am returns "patch format
> detection faild." Can you resubmit it using git format-patch?
You want to use 'git apply' on that patch, 'git am' is for applying
patches produced by 'git format-patch' only. In a pinch however, you
can relativel
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Indeed. I cannot apply the patch, git am returns "patch format
>> detection faild." Can you resubmit it using git format-patch?
>
> You want to use 'git apply' on that patch, 'git am' is for applying
> patches produced by 'git format-patch' only.
Well
Bastien writes:
> Well, I'm trying to encourage people to submit patches that I can apply
> easily with git am without having to edit the patch or to use git commit
> --author=""... to credit the patch correctly.
I wasn't trying to distract from that, just remind that you can at least
test the pat
On 12/20/2012 02:57 PM, Bastien wrote:
Indeed. I cannot apply the patch, git am returns "patch format
detection faild." Can you resubmit it using git format-patch?
OK.
Dmitry
From 1988bf0f4a5e486030e6c03b6ec172ede609d491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Antipov
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012
Dmitry Antipov writes:
> OK.
Applied, thanks!
--
Bastien
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Well, I'm trying to encourage people to submit patches that I can apply
>> easily with git am without having to edit the patch or to use git commit
>> --author=""... to credit the patch correctly.
>
> I wasn't trying to distract from that, just remind that
mohamed writes:
> Myles,
> Thank you for this answer.
> I tried it with
> ---
> (add-to-list 'org-export-preprocess-hook
> 'my-export-delete-headlines-tagged-noheading)
> ---
Sorry, I should have said: add it to org-export-before-processi
Tony Day writes:
> I have exactly 386 TODO entries and may as well introduce some
> randomness to get to them.
>
> org-random-entry: select and goto a random todo entry. Prefix allows you
> to select which todo keyword.
>
> https://gist.github.com/4343164
Thanks, I'm using this already. One les
Hi Tony,
Tony Day writes:
> I have exactly 386 TODO entries and may as well introduce some
> randomness to get to them.
>
> org-random-entry: select and goto a random todo entry. Prefix allows you
> to select which todo keyword.
I added an entry in org-hacks.org:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hac
Thanks Myles,
This is realy what I want. I have just to fix something (may be my
org-version).
The variable org-export-before-processing-hook seems missing.
I have org-version 7.8.10 (with emacs 24.2.1)
Regards,
Mohame
2012/12/20 Myles English
>
> mohamed writes:
>
> > Myles,
> > Thank you for t
This commit breaks essentially all Babel tests, like this:
Test ob-C/simple-program condition:
(file-already-exists "File already exists" "/tmp/tmp-orgtest/scor-22752K82")
FAILED4/378 ob-C/simple-program
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Bl
On 20 Dec 2012 06:56, "Richard Riley" wrote:
> What would be nice would for org-tag-alist to allow org files to be
> included so all tags in those were enabled too.
Oh, yes please!
Brian vdB
Michael Albinus writes:
Hi,
> Looks, like nobody did take the ball :-(
>
> Maybe I'll check it again over XMas days, and maybe I can propose a
> concrete patch then.
The following patch I've committed to Emacs' trunk, it fixes the problem
as far as I could test. Maybe somebody from the org main
Hi Michael,
Michael Albinus writes:
> The following patch I've committed to Emacs' trunk, it fixes the problem
> as far as I could test. Maybe somebody from the org maintainers could
> merge it into the org repository.
I've already merged it in maint and master.
Thanks a lot!
--
Bastien
Hi Mohamed,
Mohamed HIBTI writes:
> The variable org-export-before-processing-hook seems missing.
> I have org-version 7.8.10 (with emacs 24.2.1)
This variable is available in the contrib/ directory of latest
"unstable" Org -- from the git master branch.
--
Bastien
Mohamed HIBTI writes:
> Thanks Myles,
> This is realy what I want. I have just to fix something (may be my
> org-version).
> The variable org-export-before-processing-hook seems missing.
> I have org-version 7.8.10 (with emacs 24.2.1)
> Regards,
> Mohame
Sorry again, I should have said that I am
Bastien writes:
> Michael Albinus writes:
>
>> The following patch I've committed to Emacs' trunk, it fixes the problem
>> as far as I could test. Maybe somebody from the org maintainers could
>> merge it into the org repository.
>
> I've already merged it in maint and master.
Unfortunately it br
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Alan Schmitt <
alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously
> does not work.
>
> If one could specify a list of tags from which to complete, it would be
> great as well.
>
>
Are you usin
I got it thank you guys !!
2012/12/20 Myles English
>
> Mohamed HIBTI writes:
>
> > Thanks Myles,
> > This is realy what I want. I have just to fix something (may be my
> > org-version).
> > The variable org-export-before-processing-hook seems missing.
> > I have org-version 7.8.10 (with emacs
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Bastien writes:
> > Michael Albinus writes:
> >
> >> The following patch I've committed to Emacs' trunk, it fixes the problem
> >> as far as I could test. Maybe somebody from the org maintainers could
> >> merge it into the org repository.
> >
> > I've already merged it in m
Achim Gratz writes:
> Unfortunately it breaks testing, at least in batch mode. See my other
> posting about it.
Not sure what other posting I should read -- sorry, I can't read and
process on the threads at once.
If you know how to fix the tests, please go ahead.
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Nick Dokos writes:
> Isn't ``make test'' standard procedure before a commit? If not, it should be.
> Otherwise, why have a test suite?
"Errare humanum est... "
Yes, I should have tested.
But note that this is already committed in Emacs trunk.
My assumption by looking at the code was that if te
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Hendy writes:
>
> > (setq org-link-to-org-use-id "create-if-interactive")
>
> This should be
>
> (setq org-link-to-org-use-id 'create-if-interactive)
>
>
Grrr. I bet I know what happened -- I used =M-x customize-variable= to
Achim Gratz writes:
>>> The following patch I've committed to Emacs' trunk, it fixes the problem
>>> as far as I could test. Maybe somebody from the org maintainers could
>>> merge it into the org repository.
>>
>> I've already merged it in maint and master.
>
> Unfortunately it breaks testing, a
Hi Michael,
thanks for offering your help!
The first step is to clone the repository:
~$ git clone git://orgmode.org/org-mode.git
You are in the master branch, the one we use for latest developments.
The other branch is "maint", the one we use for bug fixing. The next
version of Org, 7.9.3 wil
Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> If you have such a Sh code block in any Org document, you'll see that the 4th
> line will be highlighted as an Org comment from the "# != 2"...
This is now fixed, thanks.
--
Bastien
Hi all,
Giovanni Ridolfi writes:
> thanks for catching, however
>
> org-export-as-latex is an interactive autoloaded Lisp function in
> `org-latex.el'.
>
> This export engine will be dropped and replaced by the new exporter,
> so I don't think it will be fixed.
I fixed this -- we still don't kn
Achim Gratz writes:
> Still, reverting 7a9d3457073 should solve that problem. The alternative
> would be to remove that argument in all other org-export-as-
> functions.
PS: that's what I did, except for the DocBook exporter, which I will
certainly move to contrib/ for 8.0 anyway.
--
Bastien
I have a checklist in an org item that I fill out every day. It would
be wonderful to have a simple keybinding (maybe even TAB) to jump to the
next checkbox. Does such a function already exist somewhere?
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing Software DevelopmentTraining
Hi Dave,
Dave Abrahams writes:
> I have a checklist in an org item that I fill out every day. It would
> be wonderful to have a simple keybinding (maybe even TAB) to jump to the
> next checkbox. Does such a function already exist somewhere?
There is `org-next-item' which comes close.
You can
Bastien writes:
>> Unfortunately it breaks testing, at least in batch mode. See my other
>> posting about it.
>
> Not sure what other posting I should read -- sorry, I can't read and
> process on the threads at once.
The other posting is "27bcf9a70b Backport revno 111277 from Emacs trunk."
> If
>
> I added an entry in org-hacks.org:
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html#sec-1-1-1
I never knew about the org-hacks section.
*adds a TODO*
John Hendy writes:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Alan Schmitt <
> alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously
>> does not work.
>>
>> If one could specify a list of tags from which to complete, it would be
>>
Achim Gratz wrote:
> This commit breaks essentially all Babel tests, like this:
>
> Test ob-C/simple-program condition:
> (file-already-exists "File already exists"
> "/tmp/tmp-orgtest/scor-22752K82")
>FAILED4/378 ob-C/simple-program
>
>
We basically have the inverse of Loris Be
Hi. Patch seems to work. Tested on fresh emacs-snapshot (24.3.50.1)
install on ubuntu with org-mode freshly pulled from git (7.9.2).
#+NAME: hobbits
| bilbo | frodo |
#+name: execOnExample.com
#+BEGIN_SRC sh :var foo=hobbits :dir /g...@example.com: :results output
hostname
echo executed on `h
57 matches
Mail list logo
