Jambunathan,
Thanks to you, and Nicolas, for your patience.
I now see (blindingly, now that I do see) that the export engine
adds the # to internal links, not me.
The only trailing issue I see is the "soft error" of no tag
on <> (see W3C notes below).
This (org):
Looking at the documentation and also the website and Worg, I see that
we still use all these monikers interchangeably in both capitalized and
lowercase form throughout. I seem to remember that there was some
discussion that only one of them should be used going forward, but I
can't find it...
Eric S Fraga writes:
> I used to have this problem and it was incredibly annoying. I also
> started adding the line Bernt suggests but I kept forgetting for new
> files. I finally solved this problem by adding the following lines to
> my emacs initialisation:
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (pref
Achim Gratz writes:
> Looking at the documentation and also the website and Worg, I see that
> we still use all these monikers interchangeably in both capitalized and
> lowercase form throughout. I seem to remember that there was some
> discussion that only one of them should be used going forwa
Hi all
Is there a way to have automatic alignments in the Org buffer with M-q
(fill-paragraph) and C-c C-c like:
- cmd ::short term + short descr
- cmd -o :: short term + short descr
- cmd --log-level=err -o ::
long term + short desc
Hi all
If OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 is too old to count please tell me and forget.
With an Org file containing only "* a\n" the old exporter is ok but the
new exporter release_7.8.10-633 on 23.3.1 makes an ODT reported as
"corrupt" by OOo. Attached are the Org and ODT exported as old, new
and new repa
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> look at:
> /org-mode/doc/Documentation_Standards.org
I know and FWIW I think these are all good suggestions. However, I seem
to remember that this was again discussed when the printed Org mode
manual was in preparation. Our "official" website seems to have
semi-standard
Achim Gratz writes:
> So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any
> and should we work to standardize it across all documentation?
It would indeed be very usefull to have that written in stone once and forever,
I personally like Org-mode best.
--
cheers,
Thorsten
Hi Achim and Thorsten,
Achim Gratz writes:
> So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any
> and should we work to standardize it across all documentation?
The documentation standards states:
- Prefer "Org mode" to "Org-mode" or "org-mode". This is simply
because
> The only trailing issue I see is the "soft error" of no tag
> on <> (see W3C notes below).
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/a.html#a-tags
>
> "An a element must have both a start tag and an end tag."
This is now fixed.
Hello,
I will give a talk [fn:1] next weekend about Org mode at a small hacker
conference in Germany: Gulaschprogrammiernacht 2012 [fn:2]. There will
be around 300 people and I hope I can awake enthusiasm for Org mode. My
talk will be recorded and I once I finished my slides I will put them on
my
Including images like this results in
\href{t}{./pics/verification\_RoI\_results/BugAndItsSource.pdf} in
Latex:
#+CAPTION: A bug and its source.
#+LABEL: fig:BugAndItsSource
#+ATTR_LaTeX: width=1.0\textwidth placement=[H]
[[./pics/verification_RoI_results/BugAndItsSource.pdf]]
Emacs : GNU Emacs
Have you tried the new exporter?
1. Add contrib/lisp to load-path
2. M-x load-library RET org-export RET
3. M-x org-export-dispatch RET
You will have to migrate your existing config to the new exporter.
M-x customize-group RET org-export-e-latex RET (Note the presence of
"e").
Search for org-e
Michael Brand writes:
> Hi all
>
> If OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 is too old to count please tell me and forget.
>
> With an Org file containing only "* a\n" the old exporter is ok but the
> new exporter release_7.8.10-633 on 23.3.1 makes an ODT reported as
> "corrupt" by OOo. Attached are the Org and O
Jambunathan K writes:
> I think the error could be because of one of the customizations you
> have.
Good way to check this is with:
"C:\Program Files\emacs-24.0.97\bin\runemacs.exe" -Q -L
~/src/org-mode/lisp/ -L ~/src/org-mode/contrib/lisp/
(Note the -Q and adjusted load-paths)
M-x load-libra
Hello all,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:11:48PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Achim and Thorsten,
>
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
> > So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any
> > and should we work to standardize it across all documentation?
>
> The documentation standards s
Florian Adamsky writes:
Hello Florian,
> I will give a talk [fn:1] next weekend about Org mode at a small hacker
> conference in Germany
Karlsruhe is too far away for me, unfortunately. However, I'm really
impressed by the beautiful design of your homepage:
,--
Hi Gregory,
* Gregory Benjamin [02. Jun. 2012]:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:11:48PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>> The documentation standards states:
>>
>> - Prefer "Org mode" to "Org-mode" or "org-mode". This is simply
>>because it reflects an existing convention in The Emacs Manual which
>>
Jambunathan K writes:
> Unless you hand-edited the ODT document, I think the error could be
> because of one of the customizations you have. (Do you have
> `org-e-odt-prettify-xml' set to t. If yes, what mode does mimetype
> file open for you. For me, mimetype opens in Fundamental mode.)
Afte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Is it possible to insert and view picture in a .org file with emacs?
I want to se the picture in the text while editing the .org file.
Possible?
By
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAk/KMd4ACgkQ2+bVj21Y+8
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Achim and Thorsten,
>
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any
>> and should we work to standardize it across all documentation?
>
> The documentation standards states:
>
> - Prefer "Org
"itm...@chrikro.net" writes:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to insert and view picture in a .org file with emacs?
> I want to se the picture in the text while editing the .org file.
> Possible?
(Self-service)
M-x org-info RET
Within info buffer,
i inline TAB
--
Hi Jambunathan
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
> After sending out the email, I realized that `org-e-odt-prettify-xml' is
> ON by default in the org-e-odt.el. Now I have turned it off.
>
> Hopefully things are OK at your end with this "fix".
Thank you for looking into this.
Dear Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Florian Adamsky writes:
>
>> I will give a talk [fn:1] next weekend about Org mode at a small hacker
>> conference in Germany
>
> Karlsruhe is too far away for me, unfortunately. However, I'm really
> impressed by the beautiful design of your homepage:
>
Jambunathan K writes:
> Have you tried the new exporter?
>
> 1. Add contrib/lisp to load-path
> 2. M-x load-library RET org-export RET
> 3. M-x org-export-dispatch RET
Better yet, hardlink those files in contrib/lisp you want to use into
lisp/, but remember to always edit them in contrib/lisp and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jambunathan K skrev 2012-06-02 17:42:
> "itm...@chrikro.net" writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Is it possible to insert and view picture in a .org file with
>> emacs? I want to se the picture in the text while editing the
>> .org file. Possible?
>
> (Self-ser
[forgot to CC: the list - apologies for duplication]
itm...@chrikro.net wrote:
> Jambunathan K skrev 2012-06-02 17:42:
> > "itm...@chrikro.net" writes:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Is it possible to insert and view picture in a .org file with
> >> emacs? I want to se the picture in the text while edi
Org-mode can mislead you into thinking that it is a command or a
major-mode symbol. It is neither. :)
So the Bikeshed Vote of the Week for me goes to Org mode in docs in
conformance with the Emacs Manual.
I'd suggest Org when referring to the entire collection of Org mode,
Orgstruct mode, Org m
Florian Adamsky writes:
Hi Florian,
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Florian Adamsky writes:
>>
>>> I will give a talk [fn:1] next weekend about Org mode at a small hacker
>>> conference in Germany
>>
>> Karlsruhe is too far away for me, unfortunately. However, I'm really
>> impressed by the bea
Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> Hi Achim and Thorsten,
>
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any
>> and should we work to standardize it across all documentation?
>
> The documentation standards states:
>
> - Prefer "Org mode" to "Org-mode" or
Nick Dokos skrev 2012-06-02 21:13:
> [forgot to CC: the list - apologies for duplication]
>
> itm...@chrikro.net wrote:
>
>> Jambunathan K skrev 2012-06-02 17:42:
>>> "itm...@chrikro.net" writes:
>>>
Hi!
Is it possible to insert and view picture in a .org file with
emacs? I
On 06/02/2012 04:10 PM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Bastien,
>
> Bastien wrote:
>> Hi Achim and Thorsten,
>>
>> Achim Gratz writes:
>>
>>> So my question still stands, which variant is the preferred one if any
>>> and should we work to standardize it across all documentation?
>>
>> The documentation
See this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-10/msg00792.html
You need to copy libpng (or whatever dll) to your emacs bin directory -
directory where runemacs.exe is located.
Hi, folks. Just FYI:
- Forwarded Message -
>From: Yihui Xie
>To: Stephen Eglen
>Cc: ess-h...@r-project.org
>Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 3:08 PM
>Subject: Re: [ESS] knitr
>
>There is no point comparing markdown with org mode, and the answer
>will be definitely this: org mode can bea
Hi, guys!
I'm finally beginning to integrate Org mode into my way of thinking.
But one thing really bothers me: local subtree view.
The closest thing I'd like to have is (org-tree-to-indirect-buffer),
but, first, there's a bug in it (I use Emacs 23.4.2 - latest official):
- When I edit the last e
Hi Rebel,
On 6/2/12, Rebel Neurofog wrote:
> The closest thing I'd like to have is (org-tree-to-indirect-buffer),
> but, first, there's a bug in it (I use Emacs 23.4.2 - latest official):
> - When I edit the last empty line in indirect buffer, the new text
> gets into next entry (inside original
All right, preliminary patch is attached, *maybe* good enough for more
serious consideration now, but might need some fixes. Still only uses
ordinary regexps and plain-text strings, but can now handle the example
with formatting-breaks next to quotes. Things have been moved into more
appropriat
Hi, people.
On the nomenclature issue of our preferred tool, if I had my say, I
would suggest Org, and drop "mode". Org is really a major Emacs mode,
in many acceptations of the word "major". We should speak of Org the
same way we speak of Calc or Gnus (or Dired).
Of course, these all have a mo
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
> Hi Rebel,
>
> On 6/2/12, Rebel Neurofog wrote:
>> The closest thing I'd like to have is (org-tree-to-indirect-buffer),
>> but, first, there's a bug in it (I use Emacs 23.4.2 - latest official):
>> - When I edit the last empty line in indirect
François Pinard writes:
> On the nomenclature issue of our preferred tool, if I had my say, I
> would suggest Org, and drop "mode". Org is really a major Emacs mode,
> in many acceptations of the word "major". We should speak of Org the
> same way we speak of Calc or Gnus (or Dired).
Org is n
40 matches
Mail list logo
