-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31/03/11 05:40, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600
>> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>>
This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch
which introduces new features and run af
Steven Haryanto writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing an Org parser for Perl[1]. There are a few things about the
> syntax which are still unclear to me.
>
> 1. The manual says that multiple (different) in-buffer settings can be
> specified on the same line, but so far I haven't found such example
>
Steven Haryanto writes:
[...]
>>From the manual (emphasis mine): "*Several setting words* can be in the same
> line, but you can also have multiple lines for the keyword." So I guess
> "setting words" mean setting's arguments (and not setting names, like
> specifying OPTIONS and TODO on the same
On Mar 31, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Steven Haryanto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing an Org parser for Perl[1]. There are a few things about the
> syntax which are still unclear to me.
>
> 1. The manual says that multiple (different) in-buffer settings can be
> specified on the same line, but so far
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Steven Haryanto writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing an Org parser for Perl[1]. There are a few things about the
> > syntax which are still unclear to me.
> >
> > 1. The manual says that multiple (different) in-buffer settings can be
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Carsten Dominik
wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Steven Haryanto wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing an Org parser for Perl[1]. There are a few things about the
> syntax which are still unclear to me.
> >
> > 1. The manual says that multiple (different)
Samuel & Nick,
I'm using priorities now, but there's only 3 of 'em. I would prefer
finer control over them if I were to continue using priorities in this
way.
Q: My reading of the doc is that there's no way to change the number
of priorities org supports: we're "stuck" with A/B/C. Right?
Tags
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Filippo A. Salustri wrote:
> Samuel & Nick,
>
> I'm using priorities now, but there's only 3 of 'em. I would prefer
> finer control over them if I were to continue using priorities in this
> way.
>
> Q: My reading of the doc is that there's no way to change the nu
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
> Agreed. Google Scholar citations need very close proofreading, as they
> can be erroneous or poorly formatted.
Thanks Matt - I'd agree with this, having seen oddities from google
scholar. I emailed them ages ago about one problem (formatting of
initials in author names), but never heard back.
Hello,
"Mark S" writes:
> Hello Matt,
>
> --- On Wed, 3/30/11, Matt Lundin wrote:
>
>>I cannot reproduce this.
>>All of the following timer items were entered quickly using
>> M-Tab:
>> - 0:01:04 :: An item
>> - 0:01:07 :: Another item
>> - 0:01:10 :: Yet another
>>
>
> It appears that you
On 03/31/2011 06:41 AM, Steven Haryanto wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Filippo A. Salustri
mailto:salus...@ryerson.ca>> wrote:
Samuel & Nick,
I'm using priorities now, but there's only 3 of 'em. I would prefer
finer control over them if I were to continue using prioritie
Hi Carsten,
I noticed you have added a new function to org.el called
org-new-numbered-item, which inserts items like this:
* TODO Action #1:#1:
* TODO Action #2:#2:
I'd be curious to learn more about possible uses for this feature.
Hi Matt,
On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> I noticed you have added a new function to org.el called
> org-new-numbered-item, which inserts items like this:
>
> * TODO Action #1:#1:
> * TODO Action #2
I just found org-{lowest,highest,default}-priority before coming to
work; didn't have time to post about them. These do in fact let one
change the number of priorities.
I think, for now at least, I fall into the "go crazy" category. I
range my priorities from A to Z. Hopefully I'll find a less e
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> I noticed you have added a new function to org.el called
>> org-new-numbered-item, which inserts items like this:
>>
>> * TODO Action #1:#1:
>> * TODO Action #2
Hello,
After learning that I can output my Org documents (with tables,
outlined notes and all!) into LaTeX, I've started writing some notes
with the intention of exporting them to LaTeX. So I've been typing
stuff like (sorry, I'm not sure about the standard for formatting code
for emails):
This e
Chris Beard writes:
> Hello,
> After learning that I can output my Org documents (with tables,
> outlined notes and all!) into LaTeX, I've started writing some notes
> with the intention of exporting them to LaTeX. So I've been typing
> stuff like (sorry, I'm not sure about the standard for forma
In http://orgmode.org/index.html#sec-4
there is this line
... latest released manuals (currently for Org 7.5), please browse
this directory.
The 'this directory' link seems to be broken
Hi Rainer,
Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> I get the following tangled output
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>>
>> REV=$(cat <<'BABEL_TABLE'
>> master
>> BABEL_TABLE
>> )
>> STATE=$(cat <<'BABEL_TABLE'
>> edited
>> BABEL_TABLE
>> )
>> rm -rf ./R
>> rm -f ./sp
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
-
Sébastien Vauban
writes:
> Hi Bernt,
>
> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> I can move forwards and backwards one day at a time with 'f' and 'b' and it
>> works great. If however I want to jump to a specific date the block view is
>> lost and it reverts back to the regular calendar agenda view.
>
> In the
Hi all,
I'm looking to customize how some agenda commands work.
The simple example I'm working on is combining changing a task's
priority AND refreshing the agenda.
What I'd normally do is:
1. cursor to the task of interest,
2. change its priority,
3. refresh the agenda.
After step 3, the cursor
Filippo A. Salustri wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm looking to customize how some agenda commands work.
> The simple example I'm working on is combining changing a task's
> priority AND refreshing the agenda.
>
> What I'd normally do is:
> 1. cursor to the task of interest,
> 2. change its priority,
> 3.
Nick,
Thanks for the quick reply.
I'd actually started with a similar wrapper for org-priority, and the
save-excursion was needed because the org-agenda-redo would punt me
into the agenda from whatever other buffer I was in.
I carried the save-excursion into the agenda version of the function
bec
Rustom Mody writes:
> In http://orgmode.org/index.html#sec-4
> there is this line
> ... latest released manuals (currently for Org 7.5), please browse
> this directory.
>
> The 'this directory' link seems to be broken
Yep, it's a 404.
http://orgmode.org/manual/release_7.5/
There are no directo
Samuel Wales writes:
> IIUC, OP wants to move stuff around more easily and not have improper
> body text folded. Improper in this case means belonging to the
> grandparent but after parents. He doesn't need improper outline
> exporting.
>
> Correct?
Agreed. That's how I read it. The issue has
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Babel does have a way to bring changes back from pure source code into
> code blocks in an Org-mode document. While it isn't perfect (especially
> if you make extensive use of noweb references or variables) there are
> mechanisms to maintain
Sean O'Halpin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> > Babel does have a way to bring changes back from pure source code into
> > code blocks in an Org-mode document. While it isn't perfect (especially
> > if you make extensive use of noweb references or variables) the
Stephen Eglen writes:
>> Agreed. Google Scholar citations need very close proofreading, as they
>> can be erroneous or poorly formatted.
>
> Thanks Matt - I'd agree with this, having seen oddities from google
> scholar. I emailed them ages ago about one problem (formatting of
> initials in auth
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> 2. exporters use various methods to export the file (e.g. the HTML
>exporter goes line by line, the LaTeX exporter parses the file and
>render each section);
>
>*Example*: users often ask why the LaTeX exporter cannot export a
>headline of level 3 right a
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 01:34, Matt Lundin wrote:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> IIUC, OP wants to move stuff around more easily and not have improper
>> body text folded. Improper in this case means belonging to the
>> grandparent but after parents. He doesn't need improper outline
>> exporting.
>
Suppose that you export the following document to HTML:
* Heading 1
** Heading 2
The HTML structure is pretty much the following:
div class=outline-2
h2 Heading 1
div class=outline-text-2
div class=outline-3
h3 Heading 2
Is there a way to apply a custom CSS class to the:
You can add custom styles via properties:
In order to add styles to a subtree, use the :HTML_CONTAINER_CLASS:
property to assign a class to the tree. In order to specify CSS styles
for a particular headline, you can use the id specified in a
:CUSTOM_ID: property.
http://orgmode.org/manual
Luke Crook writes:
> Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Since this could be generally useful would you be willing to add it to
>> the library of babel (org/contrib/babel/library-of-babel.org)?
>
> That would be great.
>
>> If so then if you could supply a few explanatory sentences, I'll add
Hi list,
I'm a long-time org user, and when I followed the development and
release of org-babel with great interest. However, I never really used
it, mainly because I never really found a use-case for me.
I noticed that there were a lot of messages regarding babel and
publishing, but I've read a
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Sean O'Halpin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Eric Schulte
>> wrote:
>> > Babel does have a way to bring changes back from pure source code into
>> > code blocks in an Org-mode document. While it isn't perfect (especially
>> >
Hello Nicolas,
--- On Thu, 3/31/11, Nicolas wrote:
I cannot reproduce what you are describing. I may be
misunderstanding you. Could you please post an ECM
for that?
What's an ECM?
The scenario described has occurred 2 or 3 times now, though I can't
figure out the exact sequence.
Anothe
One more thing to the list.
Use htmlfontify instead of htmlize. Former is part of standard Emacs
while the latter is not.
Jambunathan K.
Backward compatibility is a real issue.
The real challenge is how to move forward while also not breaking
anything that the users have come to rely on.
> Thus, Org documentation should provide an exhaustive list of
> environments and objects it offers with their associated format during
> expor
Sean O'Halpin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > Sean O'Halpin wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Eric Schulte
> >> wrote:
> >> > Babel does have a way to bring changes back from pure source code into
> >> > code blocks in an Org-mode document. Whi
Jambunathan K wrote:
> Do look at my new html exporter. I have been very conservative in making
> the changes.
>
Well, Nicolas's proposal is more radical, but there is no inherent
backward compatibility disadvantage to it that I can see.
> Some observations from my side ...
>
> > It isn't doc
Hello,
"Mark S" writes:
>>I cannot reproduce what you are describing. I may be
>> misunderstanding you. Could you please post an ECM
>> for that?
>>
> What's an ECM?
A minimal Org buffer with a recipe to reproduce the bug.
> Another thing I've noticed is that sometimes the list items are
> cr
43 matches
Mail list logo
